2018
DOI: 10.1007/978-3-319-94334-3_21
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Analysis and Improvement of the Usability of a Tele-Rehabilitation Platform for Hip Surgery Patients

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
8
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
5
2

Relationship

4
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 9 publications
0
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The first iteration began with the selection of three relevant interfaces from the exploratory prototype: Login, Questionnaire, and Exercise Assessment. These interfaces were selected using the following criteria [27]:…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…The first iteration began with the selection of three relevant interfaces from the exploratory prototype: Login, Questionnaire, and Exercise Assessment. These interfaces were selected using the following criteria [27]:…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…On the basis of the quantitative results and recommendation of the authors [14,27], two usability evaluation methods were selected: heuristic evaluation and cognitive walkthrough. Heuristic evaluation is a usability inspection method that identifies usability problems based on usability principles or heuristics [20].…”
Section: Related Researchmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The overall score was 81 out of 100, which suggests a good usability of the Web application [43]. Next, in [39], the authors assert that the lack of usability may lead to problems of confusion, error, and delay, or even abandonment of the physical therapy. This study was a preliminary analysis based on an empirical heuristic evaluation.…”
Section: Usability Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For the second phase, the experiment had 39 participants for the third iteration and 12 participants for the fourth iteration. The age range for these last two iterations was 18-30 years old [15].…”
Section: Experimental Designmentioning
confidence: 99%