2009
DOI: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2009.08.039
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Analysis and evaluation of soundscapes in public parks through interviews and measurement of noise

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

7
47
0
10

Year Published

2011
2011
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6
4

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 140 publications
(75 citation statements)
references
References 12 publications
7
47
0
10
Order By: Relevance
“…The conventional study of the acoustic environment mostly just comprises the description, classification, and measurement of the component sound sources [15][16][17], using energy, frequency, and statistical time-averaged descriptors, and in some cases psychoacoustical descriptors [18][19][20][21]. On the other hand, the concept of soundscape involves the perception of the acoustic environment.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The conventional study of the acoustic environment mostly just comprises the description, classification, and measurement of the component sound sources [15][16][17], using energy, frequency, and statistical time-averaged descriptors, and in some cases psychoacoustical descriptors [18][19][20][21]. On the other hand, the concept of soundscape involves the perception of the acoustic environment.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…They found that although subjective evaluation of the sound levels were correlated with the mean equivalent sound pressure levels, considerable differences occurred with the acoustic comfort evaluation. The importance of personal parameters, activities, perceptions, and other non-acoustic factors for the evaluation of acoustic comfort has since been confirmed by further studies (Szeremeta et al, 2009;Kang and Zhang 2010).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 78%
“…Esta situação pode ser encontrada em capitais e cidades de grande porte (Niemeyer & Cortês, 2012) ou mesmo em cidades de médio porte (Giunta et al, 2012) e de pequeno porte (Scherer et al, 2008). Szeremeta & Zannin (2009) concluíram que o tráfego de veículos no entorno dos parques de Curitiba é a segunda fonte de ruído mais notada pelos usuários, sendo considerado desagradável pela maioria dos entrevistados. Segundo Schimitt (2014), que apresentou um estudo com o mapeamento de ruído na cidade de Porto Alegre, a normalização que limita o nível de ruído no meio urbano não é atendida em praticamente toda nenhuma região da cidade, Aleixo et al (2014) chegaram à mesma conclusão em Goiânia e Guedes et al (2014), na cidade de Aracaju.…”
Section: Revisão Da Literaturaunclassified