2015
DOI: 10.1007/978-81-322-2247-7_38
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Analysis and Evaluation of Image Quality Metrics

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
15
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
1
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 37 publications
(17 citation statements)
references
References 20 publications
1
15
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This indicates that UQI is the least similar to the human judgement, which was also reported by Wang et al where he has verified that UQI is an unsuccessful FR-IQA method that fails to correlate with all the subjective assessment [35]. Besides that, UQI is unstable when the mean and standard deviation of the image intensity are close to zero [35,47].…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 57%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…This indicates that UQI is the least similar to the human judgement, which was also reported by Wang et al where he has verified that UQI is an unsuccessful FR-IQA method that fails to correlate with all the subjective assessment [35]. Besides that, UQI is unstable when the mean and standard deviation of the image intensity are close to zero [35,47].…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 57%
“…NQM evaluates the image quality based on image degradation model, and it separates the impact of frequency distortion and noise injection on Human Visual System (HVS). It was proven to be an excellent IQA to assess the image quality on natural images [47]. On the other hand, UQI has the lowest mean value of correlation coefficients (PLCC, SROCC and KROCC) and the highest mean value of RMSE with DMOS.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The cycle of denoising utilizing the proposed strategy has appeared in Figure 8. Execution measurements like PSNR, SNR, MSE [15] and SSIM [14] are assessed.…”
Section: Proposed Hybrid Filter Using Obnlm and Dncnnmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…IQA techniques could be: Objective or Subjective. Subjective evaluation is timeconsuming, costly and resource-intensive, this type gets along with human visual system (HVS) [9]. Objective image feature metrics can be grouped according to the availability of an original (distortion-free) image, in which the distorted image is to be compared.…”
Section: Objective and Evaluation Metricsmentioning
confidence: 99%