2000
DOI: 10.1017/s0022112000001270
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Analysis and direct numerical simulation of the flow at a gravity-current head. Part 2. The lobe-and-cleft instability

Abstract: Results are presented from a linear-stability analysis of the flow at the head of two-dimensional gravity-current fronts. The analysis was undertaken in order to clarify the instability mechanism that leads to the formation of the complex lobe-and-cleft pattern which is commonly observed at the leading edge of gravity currents propagating along solid boundaries. The stability analysis concentrates on the foremost part of the front, and is based on direct numerical simulation data of two-dimensional lock-ex… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

9
99
0

Year Published

2007
2007
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
6
2
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 127 publications
(108 citation statements)
references
References 11 publications
9
99
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Despite the different model setup, the lobe-cleft instability was observed and the same conclusion has been drawn. In particular, a linear stability analysis is provided in section 4 of Hartel et al (2000a) to explain this phenomenon.…”
Section: Lobe-cleft Instabilitymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Despite the different model setup, the lobe-cleft instability was observed and the same conclusion has been drawn. In particular, a linear stability analysis is provided in section 4 of Hartel et al (2000a) to explain this phenomenon.…”
Section: Lobe-cleft Instabilitymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The grid resolution for suspensiondriven and scalar-driven surges is the same as that used in Zgheib et al [29,30] for rectangular releases, where the adequacy of the grid for converged solution has been established. Also the grid resolution employed is consistent with the requirement that the grid spacing must be of the order of O (ReSc) −1 / 2 [2,15] . We use two values for the Reynolds number Re = 8430 and Re = 8950 for suspension-driven and scalar-driven gravity surges, respectively.…”
Section: Mathematical Formulationmentioning
confidence: 91%
“…Because of their unequal propagation speeds, some of the relatively faster vortex tubes will catch up with slower tubes ahead and merge to form bigger rolled up vortices (see Fig. 3 at t = 4 and t = 6) Furthermore, as the current starts to decelerate, (and because of the no-slip boundary condition at the bottom surface) lobe and cleft structures [21,15] begin to emerge rendering the once smooth front more complex and three-dimensional. The speed of the current continuously develops along its circumference, and as a result, the lobe and cleft structures evolve by merging and splitting along the front.…”
Section: Three-dimensional Structuresmentioning
confidence: 99%