Proceedings of the ACM 1999 Conference on Java Grande 1999
DOI: 10.1145/304065.304101
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Analysis and development of Java Grande benchmarks

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
33
0

Year Published

2001
2001
2013
2013

Publication Types

Select...
7
2
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 51 publications
(33 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
33
0
Order By: Relevance
“…To give a first evaluation of typical performance improvements achieved by the DLA compilation we have considered two well known scientific benchsuite (JavaGrande [16] and Scimark [20]) as target. The DLA technique has been implemented into our dynamic compiler, called Intermediate Language Distributed Just In Time (ILDJIT) [7], briefly described by Figure 3.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To give a first evaluation of typical performance improvements achieved by the DLA compilation we have considered two well known scientific benchsuite (JavaGrande [16] and Scimark [20]) as target. The DLA technique has been implemented into our dynamic compiler, called Intermediate Language Distributed Just In Time (ILDJIT) [7], briefly described by Figure 3.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In addition, we analyzed four distributable applications: a re-implemented distributable version of SPECjbb2005 which we call SPECjbb2005*, a DNA database matching application [KN05], and distributable versions of the Monte Carlo and Molecular Dynamic benchmarks from the Java Grande suite [MCH99,Gra]. SPECjbb2005* differs from SPECjbb2005 by distributing the contents of certain key data structures across the "warehouses" of the benchmark to avoid unnecessary non-local accesses.…”
Section: Classificationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The micro-benchmarks provided by the Java Grande benchmark suite [11] were employed to characterise the performance of the various fundamental Java operations on both core types under Hera-JVM 3 . Figure 6 shows the difference in performance between the core types for each of the micro-benchmarks included in section one of the Java Grande Suite.…”
Section: Micro-benchmarksmentioning
confidence: 99%