Analysis and Design of Decision Support System for Employee Performance Appraisal with Simple Additive Weighting (SAW) Method

Taufiq, Rohmat; Septarini, Ri Sabti; Hambali, Ahmad; Yulianti, Yulianti

doi:10.32493/informatika.v5i3.6777

Cited by 6 publications

(5 citation statements)

References 4 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Unclassified

Order By: Relevance

“…Penelitian dengan menganalisis dan merancang pendukung keputusan sesuai dengan kriteria yang ada menggunakan metode Simple Additive Weighting (SAW) agar dapat dikembangkan menjadi DSS berbasis web [10]. Metode yang digunakan dimulai dengan komunikasi dengan manajemen, khususnya pelaku penilaian kinerja karyawan.…”

Section: Pendahuluanunclassified

Pengembangan Model Penilaian Kualitas Produk dengan Pendekatan Multikriteria Berbasis Website

Martono,

Citra Widya,

Permatasari

2023

sensi

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Penilaian kualitas produk merupakan aspek penting dalam memastikan keberhasilan suatu perusahaan dan kepuasan pelanggan. Hasil penilaian dapat dipengaruhi oleh keterbatasan dan subjektivitas dalam pengumpulan data, pemilihan kriteria, dan penentuan bobot relatif. Selain itu, interpretasi hasil penilaian juga harus dilakukan dengan hati-hati, mengingat kompleksitas dan konteks yang terlibat dalam penilaian kualitas produk. Dalam era digital saat ini, penggunaan pendekatan multikriteria dan teknologi web menjadi semakin relevan dalam pengembangan model penilaian kualitas produk. Artikel ini bertujuan untuk mengembangkan model penilaian kualitas produk dengan pendekatan multikriteria berbasis web. Dalam penelitian ini, penilaian kualitas produk menggunakan metode Simple Additive Weighting (SAW) berdasarkan pendekatan multikriteria. Kriteria-kriteria yang relevan, seperti performa produk, keandalan, ketersediaan, harga, fitur, dan keberlanjutan, diidentifikasi dan diberikan bobot relatif untuk masing-masing kriteria tersebut. Metode SAW digunakan untuk menghitung skor kualitas relatif untuk setiap produk berdasarkan nilai kriteria yang dinormalisasi dan bobot yang ditetapkan. Hasil penilaian dapat memberikan peringkat produk yang berguna dalam pengambilan keputusan untuk meningkatkan kualitas produk, Diharapkan bahwa pengembangan model penilaian kualitas produk dengan pendekatan multikriteria berbasis web ini akan memberikan kontribusi yang signifikan dalam peningkatan kualitas produk dan mendukung proses penilaian kualitas produk yang lebih objektif. Model ini dapat digunakan oleh perusahaan dalam meningkatkan produk mereka dan memberikan panduan yang lebih baik dalam pengambilan keputusan.

show abstract

Section: Pendahuluanunclassified

Pengembangan Model Penilaian Kualitas Produk dengan Pendekatan Multikriteria Berbasis Website

Martono,

Citra Widya,

Permatasari

2023

sensi

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…Konsep dasar dari metode SAW adalah mencari penjumlahan terbobot, dari rating kinnerja pada setiap alternatif pada semua atribut. Metode SAW membutuhkan proses normalisasi matriks keputusan (X) ke suatu skala yang dapat dibandingkan dengan semua rating alternatif yang ada [7]. Persamaan sebagai berikut : rating alternatif yang ada.…”

Section: Mysqlunclassified

Penerapan Metode Simple Additive Weighting (SAW) Dalam Pemilihan Karyawan Berprestasi Berbasis Web

Kurnialensya¹,

Fitrianto²

2021

DINAMIKA

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Company XYZ in twelve months always has a program for selecting outstanding employees. . This selection process requires accuracy and time, because employee data will be compared with the criteria set by company XYZ. The criteria set by XYZ company are work discipline, employee attendance, obedience, teamwork, work period, work spirit, and work loyalty. The selection of outstanding employees is not right on target, because it is not based on weighting. In accordance with the regulations set by the XYZ company in the selection of outstanding employees, criteria are needed to determine who will be selected to receive the outstanding employee award.The simple additive weighting (SAW) method is often also known as the weighted addition method. The basic concept of the SAW method is to find the weighted sum of the performance ratings for each alternative on all attributes. The SAW method requires the process of normalizing the decision matrix (X) to a scale that can be compared with all existing alternative ratings. By using the SAW method can solve problems in the selection of outstanding employees.

show abstract

“…In the MCDM method most widely used method is the SAW method [9][10][11] . SAW is a classical method that can be applied to take the best alternative.…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Comparison of Simple Additive Weighting Method and Weighted Performance Indicator Method for Lecturer Performance Assessment

Terttiaavini¹,

Hartono²,

Ermatita³

et al. 2023

IJMECS

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

The development of methods for assessing lecturers' performance is needed to motivate lecturers to achieve institutional targets. Currently, lecturers are required to be able to adapt to the rapid development of technology. Lecturer performance assessment must be done periodically. Competence is measured as a basis for planning resource development activities. The method that is often used for assessing lecturer performance is the Simple Additive Weighting (SAW) method. However, the SAW method has drawbacks, namely 1) the process of determining criteria is only carried out by the leadership (subjective); 2) The SAW method can only be applied to multi-criteria data ; 3) Data ranking problems. Based on this deficiency, a new method was built, namely, the Weighted Performance Indicator (WPI) method using respondents' opinion to determine the criteria. This study aims to compare the performance of the two methods. Testing criteria using SPPS application dan WPI method, while testing methods utilized the SAW method and the WPI method. The results of the criterion test show the Percentage of Similarity of data validity = 96.7 % witht the minimum percentage limit (MPL) = 40%. While the results of the SAW method and WPI method testing resulted in the highest score in the 13th alternative, namely SAW score (v 13 ) = 793.76 and WP score (WP 13 ) = 0.928, and the lowest value in the 30th alternative, SAW score (v 30 ) = 18.60 and WP score (WP 30 ) = 0.140. the ranking positions in these two methods show similarities. However, for other alternatives, the rating value can be different.The WPI method is a scientific development in the field of decision support systems that can be applied to other performance assessments, such other human resources, system performance assesment etc.The results of this study prove that the WPI method can be used as a performance assessment method with different characteristics from the SAW method.

show abstract

Analysis and Design of Decision Support System for Employee Performance Appraisal with Simple Additive Weighting (SAW) Method

Cited by 6 publications

References 4 publications

Pengembangan Model Penilaian Kualitas Produk dengan Pendekatan Multikriteria Berbasis Website

Pengembangan Model Penilaian Kualitas Produk dengan Pendekatan Multikriteria Berbasis Website

Penerapan Metode Simple Additive Weighting (SAW) Dalam Pemilihan Karyawan Berprestasi Berbasis Web

Comparison of Simple Additive Weighting Method and Weighted Performance Indicator Method for Lecturer Performance Assessment

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About