2014
DOI: 10.1109/tie.2014.2301762
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Analysis and Design of a Wireless Power Transfer System With an Intermediate Coil for High Efficiency

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

1
62
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
5
4

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 211 publications
(63 citation statements)
references
References 24 publications
1
62
0
Order By: Relevance
“…C f is the additional compensation capacitor parallel connected between L f and the original SS-WPT system; C is the original compensation capacitor used in the SS-WPT system but the capacitance has been adjusted in the LCC-WPT system. The load resistance will vary from 5 Ω to 200 Ω to provide a wide range of load conditions, and this load resistance range can be found in existing research on WPT systems operating at around 85 kHz resonant frequency; i.e., in [23], the load resistance is 24.24 Ω; in [24], the load resistance is 30.5 Ω; in [25], the load resistance is 177.6 Ω; in [26], three load resistance values are selected as the load, 15 Ω, 50 Ω, and 200 Ω. The coil to coil vertical displacement is set at 150 mm, giving coupling coefficient of 0.27.…”
Section: Comparison Between the Lcc And The Ss-wpt Systemsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…C f is the additional compensation capacitor parallel connected between L f and the original SS-WPT system; C is the original compensation capacitor used in the SS-WPT system but the capacitance has been adjusted in the LCC-WPT system. The load resistance will vary from 5 Ω to 200 Ω to provide a wide range of load conditions, and this load resistance range can be found in existing research on WPT systems operating at around 85 kHz resonant frequency; i.e., in [23], the load resistance is 24.24 Ω; in [24], the load resistance is 30.5 Ω; in [25], the load resistance is 177.6 Ω; in [26], three load resistance values are selected as the load, 15 Ω, 50 Ω, and 200 Ω. The coil to coil vertical displacement is set at 150 mm, giving coupling coefficient of 0.27.…”
Section: Comparison Between the Lcc And The Ss-wpt Systemsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…According to Equation (1), the actual load resistance RLa is 12.35 Ω. Considering the errors and assumptions in the calculations, when the parasitic resistance is considered in the design and the calculation, the actual load resistance should be slightly larger than the calculated value and the final load resistance used in the experiments is set to be 15 Ω, which is also of a similar order to that used in various other works dealing with WPT systems for battery charging [21,22]. In this work, the DC voltage is 200 V, and the DC current is 20 A.…”
Section: Design Of the 85 Khz 200 Khz And 500 Khz Wpt Coil Systemsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To relieve the efficiency fall, one method is increasing the working frequency for a high quality factor of the coils so that the conduction loss caused by the coil resistance is reduced [24][25][26], although it was shown later that this method is not suitable for situations requiring a large amount of delivered power which is inversely proportional to frequency [24]. Besides, the intermediate coil is another way for improving efficiency [27][28][29][30][31][32], which could create large magnetic coupling with the receiver thus only small current is needed in the primary driving circuit [27]. The working mechanism for the relay coil is that it firstly receives the magnetic field from the transmitter coil and then transfers it to the receiver coil, apparently increases the coupling coefficient resulting a higher efficiency [28].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Besides, the intermediate coil is another way for improving efficiency [27][28][29][30][31][32], which could create large magnetic coupling with the receiver thus only small current is needed in the primary driving circuit [27]. The working mechanism for the relay coil is that it firstly receives the magnetic field from the transmitter coil and then transfers it to the receiver coil, apparently increases the coupling coefficient resulting a higher efficiency [28]. The optimal coil geometries for a 3-coil IPT system could be found in [23].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%