2013
DOI: 10.1016/j.jenvman.2013.04.051
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Analysis and deliberation as a mechanism to assess changes in preferences for indicators of sustainable forest management: A case study in Puebla, Mexico

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 37 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Successful collaborations are often bottom‐up and motivated by specific shared challenges, such as responses to pest outbreaks (Abrams et al 2017), fires (Stasiewicz and Paveglio 2018), and wildlife conflicts (Weladji and Tchamba 2003). Stakeholder engagement processes also can advance communication and collaboration among stakeholders, building management connectivity, and perhaps reversing ecological and management divergence (e.g., Brody 2003, Keough and Blahna 2006, Rodriguez‐Piñeros and Lewis 2013, Virapongse et al 2016). Continued research into the formation, effectiveness (or lack thereof), and durability of such relationships may help lend insights that landowners and land managers can use to replicate successful responses to emerging problems.…”
Section: Looking Forward: Breaking Management Barriers To Prepare Formentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Successful collaborations are often bottom‐up and motivated by specific shared challenges, such as responses to pest outbreaks (Abrams et al 2017), fires (Stasiewicz and Paveglio 2018), and wildlife conflicts (Weladji and Tchamba 2003). Stakeholder engagement processes also can advance communication and collaboration among stakeholders, building management connectivity, and perhaps reversing ecological and management divergence (e.g., Brody 2003, Keough and Blahna 2006, Rodriguez‐Piñeros and Lewis 2013, Virapongse et al 2016). Continued research into the formation, effectiveness (or lack thereof), and durability of such relationships may help lend insights that landowners and land managers can use to replicate successful responses to emerging problems.…”
Section: Looking Forward: Breaking Management Barriers To Prepare Formentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the past decade, experiments with putting these ideas into practice to address complex problems on many scales have been tried, including: energy facility siting and policy making (Andrews, Jonas, Mantell, & Solomon, 2008); the clean‐up of chemically and radiologically contaminated sites (Ashford & Rest, 1999; Bradbury, 1998; Bradbury et al., 2003); radioactive waste management (Guglielmo, 1998; Webler, Tuler, & Rosa, 2011); chemical weapons disposal (Goldberg, 2003); biofuels health risk management (Traviss, 2008); forest resource management (Rodriguez‐Piñeros & Lewis, 2013); regional planning (Burgess et al., 2007; Ramaswami et al., 2011); and municipal waste management (Petts, 2000, 2004; Renn, 1999; Renn & Klinke, 2004; Renn & Webler, 1998). It has also been proposed to be used in watershed management (Committee on Watershed Management, Commission on Geosciences, Environment and Resources, Division on Earth and Life Studies, & National Research Council, 1999).…”
Section: The Integration Of Analysis and Deliberationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…16 searchers of this case study argued that the social dimensions of sustainability are more important where the economic role of forestry activities is marginal, like in most Mediterranean forests (Rodriguez-Piñeros & Lewis, 2013). Ecosystem services are important in forests under all type of conditions.…”
mentioning
confidence: 91%