2016 New Trends in Signal Processing (NTSP) 2016
DOI: 10.1109/ntsp.2016.7747781
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Analysis and decoding of radio signals for remote control of drones

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
4

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 17 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 1 publication
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…It also has different modes of usage providing 7, 8 or 14 transmit control channels. It's successor FASSTEST also employs duplex communication [92] .…”
Section: Uav Operationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It also has different modes of usage providing 7, 8 or 14 transmit control channels. It's successor FASSTEST also employs duplex communication [92] .…”
Section: Uav Operationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Another technique widely used for drone detection exploits the radio frequency (RF) communication signals that are established between drone and remote control. [14][15][16] Ezuma et al have studied the detection and classification of UAVs using RF fingerprints of signals transmitted from the controller to the micro-UAV. The acquired raw signals are divided into frames and transformed into the wavelet domain to remove the bias in the signals and reduce the size of the data to be processed.…”
Section: Radio Frequency-based Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This approach can be generalized to train a classifier (e.g., a neural network) for identifying unique RF transmission patterns from popular commercially available UASs. Different RF techniques for remote UAS control are characterized in [88]. In particular, analog FM's RF signature is compared with that of spread spectrum technique, where the latter is shown to have distinguishable RF footprint compared to FM.…”
Section: A Radio Frequency Signals From Uassmentioning
confidence: 99%