2010
DOI: 10.1016/j.tws.2009.09.003
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Analysis and behavior of steel storage drive-in racks

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
11
0

Year Published

2011
2011
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 26 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 5 publications
0
11
0
Order By: Relevance
“…B1 presents the distribution of the sectorial area ω (a) and the first moment S w of ω (b) for the lipped channel with h/b = 3 and with a warping constant I w = 459,264,000 mm 6 .…”
Section: Ffiffiffiffiffiffi Ffimentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…B1 presents the distribution of the sectorial area ω (a) and the first moment S w of ω (b) for the lipped channel with h/b = 3 and with a warping constant I w = 459,264,000 mm 6 .…”
Section: Ffiffiffiffiffiffi Ffimentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The this very important aspect and propose verification approaches that do not adequately account for the effects associated with warping torsion and with the non-coincidence of the shear center and the cross-section centroid. It is worth noting that several studies have been developed on selective pallet racks [1,2], while more limited attention has been paid to drive-racks [5][6][7][8]. There is no research dealing with the response of beams in industrial storage systems, nor do key features of their response seem to be adequately accounted by the most recent rack design codes.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The downtime costs (C d ) for a single damaged structural element were calculated by means of a simple expression, where downtime costs are defined as the rent cost of a surface equivalent to that of the damaged building [3].…”
Section: Columns In the Racks (Element Type H)mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the down-aisle direction (longitudinal direction), the frame is normally designed as a moment resisting frame. Since steel storage racks are typically unbraced in the down-aisle direction, the stability relies heavily on the beam to column joints and the connection at the point of base plate (Freitas et al 2010). It was found that the capacity of energy dissipation and ductility for storage racks is much greater in the down-aisle moment-resisting direction in comparison to cross-aisle braced frame direction (FEMA 460 2005).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%