1990
DOI: 10.1177/103841119002800103
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Analysing the Quality of Workplace Labour Relations: An Exploratory Study with Reference to the Australian Metal Industry

Abstract: This paper focuses on workplace industrial relations, arguing for measures that distinguish workplaces according to variations in the quality of their labour relations. This enables workplaces to be periodically assessed and encourages research on the determinants of variations in workplace relations, thereby contributing to policy formation. The paper draws on survey data from the Australian metal industry. It concludes by suggesting that if workplace analysis is to progress, industrial relations needs to be … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

1992
1992
1992
1992

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

0
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(1 citation statement)
references
References 21 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…These results are vital to an understanding of industrial relations in Australia at the workplace level (Callus et al, 1990). For too long, according to Frenkel and Pratt (1990), commentators about workplace industrial relations have used adjectives such as 'good', 'hopeless' and 'terrible' to describe the quality of workplace industrial relations. Commentators have often done so without any supporting evidence for their contentions.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These results are vital to an understanding of industrial relations in Australia at the workplace level (Callus et al, 1990). For too long, according to Frenkel and Pratt (1990), commentators about workplace industrial relations have used adjectives such as 'good', 'hopeless' and 'terrible' to describe the quality of workplace industrial relations. Commentators have often done so without any supporting evidence for their contentions.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%