2015
DOI: 10.17485/ijst/2015/v8i15/76693
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Analysing the Quality of Association Rules by Computing an Interestingness Measures

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
15
0
2

Year Published

2016
2016
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
4

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 17 publications
(17 citation statements)
references
References 18 publications
0
15
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Secondly, we analysed the data through Association Rule Mining (ARM) [Manimaran and Velmurugan 2015a], which is a method to discover patterns within data based on the frequency of the items. ARM uses the support (frequency) of an item in the dataset, and creates rules based on logical sentences (e.g., A → B) [Agrawal et al 1993].…”
Section: Methods and Toolsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Secondly, we analysed the data through Association Rule Mining (ARM) [Manimaran and Velmurugan 2015a], which is a method to discover patterns within data based on the frequency of the items. ARM uses the support (frequency) of an item in the dataset, and creates rules based on logical sentences (e.g., A → B) [Agrawal et al 1993].…”
Section: Methods and Toolsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…ARM uses the support (frequency) of an item in the dataset, and creates rules based on logical sentences (e.g., A → B) [Agrawal et al 1993]. These rules are measured through their confidence and lift [Manimaran and Velmurugan 2015b]. To conduct the analyses and report we analyse rules focused on Narrative and Storytelling with high confidence (> 0.8) and lift ( 1.5).…”
Section: Methods and Toolsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…O Apriori identifica as regras de associação entre as variáveis A e B, considerando a frequência com que ocorrem em conjunto e eliminando as regras que estão abaixo dos limites de MinSup e MinConf. Como resultado, são obtidas as regras de associação e as medidas que identificam a correlação e dependência entre as variáveis analisadas [Manimaran and Velmurugan 2015]. As medidas obtidas indicam a frequência de coocorrência (Sup) das duas variáveis (A e B); a frequência de ocorrência somente da variável A (SupA) e da B (SupB); a frequência esperada (SupEsp) de coocorrência das variáveis A e B; e a confiança (Conf), que indica a probabilidade de B ocorrer em função da ocorrência da variável A. Outra medida obtida é o coeficiente de correlação (Phi) que indica a força da relação entre A e B, classificando o nível de correlação [Taylor 1990] como: correlação negativa perfeita (-1); forte correlação negativa (-1.0 a -0.68); moderada correlação negativa (-0.67 a -0.36); fraca ou nenhuma correlação (-0.35 a 0.35); moderada correlação positiva (0.36 a 0.67); forte correlação positiva (0.68 a 1.0); sem correlação (0); correlação positiva perfeita (1).…”
Section: Animoveminer -Framework Propostounclassified
“…Since, it failed to determine a suitable threshold for averaging algorithm. In [15] designed statistical method to analyze the quality rule of the apriori algorithm in association rule mining for splitting the interesting rules within massive association rules. FP-Growth permitted frequent itemset detection without candidate itemset generation algorithm.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%