2019
DOI: 10.1080/2331186x.2019.1574947
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Analysing the impact of external examination on teaching and learning of English at the secondary level education

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
18
0
1

Year Published

2019
2019
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 22 publications
(21 citation statements)
references
References 14 publications
2
18
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Teachers narrowed the contents of the syllabus and skipped chapters considered less important for the tests. These findings correlate with the findings of the studies conducted by Allen (2016), Qi (2005), Rind et al (2019), andSato (2019), Shih (2007), and Xie and Andrews (2012). Moreover, the washback of these tests on the teaching methods of the teachers is negative as the teachers were found to employ whatever methods they deem perfect for assisting their students to prepare for the tests and score high grades (Alderson & Wall, 1993;Sultana, 2018).…”
Section: T8supporting
confidence: 82%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Teachers narrowed the contents of the syllabus and skipped chapters considered less important for the tests. These findings correlate with the findings of the studies conducted by Allen (2016), Qi (2005), Rind et al (2019), andSato (2019), Shih (2007), and Xie and Andrews (2012). Moreover, the washback of these tests on the teaching methods of the teachers is negative as the teachers were found to employ whatever methods they deem perfect for assisting their students to prepare for the tests and score high grades (Alderson & Wall, 1993;Sultana, 2018).…”
Section: T8supporting
confidence: 82%
“…Other washback studies (e.g., Cheng, 2005;Dong, 2018Dong, , 2020Maniruzzaman & Hoque, 2010;Qi, 2005) also explored a strong negative washback of the high-stakes tests on the teachers' selection and teaching of contents. Teachers were found to skip and ignore some of the lessons of the textbook that were less likely to be set in the test (Abu-Alhija, 2007;Qi, 2005;Rind, Mari, & A., 2019). In the study of Watanabe (2000, p. 44), ignoring the curriculum, teachers used different kinds of self-made materials to suit the targeted test.…”
Section: Studies On Washbackmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Pemberian nilai dalam tugas cenderung subjektif karena tidak memiliki acuan yang terukur pada rubrik penilaian pengetahuan pada RPP. Menurut (Rind & Mari, 2019) model penilaian, praktik mengajar, dan pendekatan pembelajaran kepada siswa sangat berkorelasi. Oleh karena itu, penggunaan model penilaian sebaiknya dapat mengukur kompetensi siswa dengan tepat.…”
Section: Pelaksanaan Penilaian Pengetahuan Pjok DI Smp Negeri Malangunclassified
“…In the discussion about alternative approaches other than teaching that primarily involves traditional teaching methods, student-centered learning and technology integration are encouraged because these approaches promote students' participation as well as raise their interest learning among the students [14]. As one of the only few programs which still retains 100% external public examinations, A-level program is often criticized for promoting examination-oriented pedagogy [27], which focuses on drill and practice. As a result, it is noteworthy to examine the teachers' perspectives about which pedagogy and technological tools are most effective when teaching an A-level syllabus.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%