Analysing the clinical knowledge of ChatGPT in medical microbiology in the undergraduate medical examination

Sivasubramanian, Jayanthi; Hussain, Shifa Meharaj Shaik; Muthuprakash, Somasunder Virudhunagar; Periadurai, Nanthini Devi; Mohanram, Kalyani; Surapaneni, Krishna Mohan

doi:10.1016/j.ijmmb.2023.100380

Cited by 5 publications

(5 citation statements)

References 1 publication

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…Within the healthcare sector, the emergence of ChatGPT ignited fervent discussions concerning its potential benefits and inherent challenges. It became a subject of significant interest and exploration among researchers from diverse medical specialties, including microbiology [39], nursing [40], parasitology [41], radiology [42], and medicine [43]. Unfortunately, there remains a paucity of literature addressing the utilization of ChatGPT within the field of nutrition and dietetics.…”

Section: Discussion Implications and Limitationsmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…However, the potential applications and limitations of ChatGPT within the domain of nutrition remain relatively unexplored. Existing publications predominantly focus on related medical and health sciences, such as microbiology [39], nursing [40], parasitology [41], radiology [42], and medicine [43]. Thus, further discussions are warranted to ascertain the potential applications and limitations of ChatGPT in the domain of nutrition.…”

Section: Current Research On Nutrition and Chatgptmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…Expert validation and consultation remain crucial in ensuring accurate and reliable information for optimal care and guidance. As noted by [39] in medical education, human oversight remains crucial for ChatGPT to serve as a meaningful learning platform. Sanmarchi et al [57] share a similar opinion that blindly accepting AI-generated answers may pose significant risks to the integrity of scientific endeavors.…”

Section: Can Chatgpt Effectively Replace Dietitians and Nutrition Pro...mentioning

confidence: 99%

“…Other responses inaccurately specified food quantities and energy values. This particular limitation further underscores the importance of cautious interpretation, human validation, and expert judgment [39,59]. Meanwhile, the dependence of ChatGPT on user-provided information may cause these incorrect responses.…”

Section: Incorrect Responsesmentioning

confidence: 99%

See 3 more Smart Citations

ChatGPT as a Virtual Dietitian: Exploring Its Potential as a Tool for Improving Nutrition Knowledge

Garcia

2023

ASI

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

The field of health and medical sciences has witnessed a surge of published research exploring the applications of ChatGPT. However, there remains a dearth of knowledge regarding its specific potential and limitations within the domain of nutrition. Given the increasing prevalence of nutrition-related diseases, there is a critical need to prioritize the promotion of a comprehensive understanding of nutrition. This paper examines the potential utility of ChatGPT as a tool for improving nutrition knowledge. Specifically, it scrutinizes its characteristics in relation to personalized meal planning, dietary advice and guidance, food intake tracking, educational materials, and other commonly found features in nutrition applications. Additionally, it explores the potential of ChatGPT to support each stage of the Nutrition Care Process. Addressing the prevailing question of whether ChatGPT can replace healthcare professionals, this paper elucidates its substantial limitations within the context of nutrition practice and education. These limitations encompass factors such as incorrect responses, coordinated nutrition services, hands-on demonstration, physical examination, verbal and non-verbal cues, emotional and psychological aspects, real-time monitoring and feedback, wearable device integration, and ethical and privacy concerns have been highlighted. In summary, ChatGPT holds promise as a valuable tool for enhancing nutrition knowledge, but further research and development are needed to optimize its capabilities in this domain.

show abstract

Section: Discussion Implications and Limitationsmentioning

confidence: 99%

Section: Current Research On Nutrition and Chatgptmentioning

confidence: 99%

Section: Can Chatgpt Effectively Replace Dietitians and Nutrition Pro...mentioning

confidence: 99%

Section: Incorrect Responsesmentioning

confidence: 99%

See 2 more Smart Citations

ChatGPT as a Virtual Dietitian: Exploring Its Potential as a Tool for Improving Nutrition Knowledge

Garcia

2023

ASI

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…ChatGPT can be a valuable means of implementing an intelligent question-answering tool in the healthcare sector [19], as demonstrated by numerous studies evaluating the potential of GPT based chatbots in question-answer scenarios within specialized fields like microbiology [26], ophthalmology [27], radiology [28], and neurosurgery [29]. Most ChatGPT studies in medicine, while very promising, have only been tested through a multiple-choice simulated model.…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

ChatGPT in Occupational Medicine: A Comparative Study with Human Experts

Padovan,

Cosci,

Petillo

et al. 2024

Bioengineering

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

The objective of this study is to evaluate ChatGPT’s accuracy and reliability in answering complex medical questions related to occupational health and explore the implications and limitations of AI in occupational health medicine. The study also provides recommendations for future research in this area and informs decision-makers about AI’s impact on healthcare. A group of physicians was enlisted to create a dataset of questions and answers on Italian occupational medicine legislation. The physicians were divided into two teams, and each team member was assigned a different subject area. ChatGPT was used to generate answers for each question, with/without legislative context. The two teams then evaluated human and AI-generated answers blind, with each group reviewing the other group’s work. Occupational physicians outperformed ChatGPT in generating accurate questions on a 5-point Likert score, while the answers provided by ChatGPT with access to legislative texts were comparable to those of professional doctors. Still, we found that users tend to prefer answers generated by humans, indicating that while ChatGPT is useful, users still value the opinions of occupational medicine professionals.

show abstract

Clinical knowledge of ChatGPT in medical microbiology

Kleebayoon,

Wiwanitkit

2023

Indian Journal of Medical Microbiology

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Analysing the clinical knowledge of ChatGPT in medical microbiology in the undergraduate medical examination

Cited by 5 publications

References 1 publication

ChatGPT as a Virtual Dietitian: Exploring Its Potential as a Tool for Improving Nutrition Knowledge

ChatGPT as a Virtual Dietitian: Exploring Its Potential as a Tool for Improving Nutrition Knowledge

ChatGPT in Occupational Medicine: A Comparative Study with Human Experts

Clinical knowledge of ChatGPT in medical microbiology

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About