2009
DOI: 10.1080/22054952.2009.11464035
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Analysing Preservice Teachers’ Potential for Implementing Engineering Education in the Middle School

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
22
1

Year Published

2012
2012
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
1
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 17 publications
(27 citation statements)
references
References 21 publications
0
22
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Despite the small number of respondents (N=72) and the resultant weakness of the data for factor analysis (which arguably demands the minimum of N=100), it serves the purpose of this study by providing clear indications of the relationships between the items. A good example here is the work of Hudson, English and Dawes (2009) which reported only 36 participants but successfully employed factor analysis to establish the relationships between items and their associated constructs. The advantage of this current study is that the factor analysis is not conclusive on its own, but rather serves as complimentary evidence to a more in-depth content analysis on the phenomenon understudy.…”
Section: Conclusion Limitation and Future Researchmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Despite the small number of respondents (N=72) and the resultant weakness of the data for factor analysis (which arguably demands the minimum of N=100), it serves the purpose of this study by providing clear indications of the relationships between the items. A good example here is the work of Hudson, English and Dawes (2009) which reported only 36 participants but successfully employed factor analysis to establish the relationships between items and their associated constructs. The advantage of this current study is that the factor analysis is not conclusive on its own, but rather serves as complimentary evidence to a more in-depth content analysis on the phenomenon understudy.…”
Section: Conclusion Limitation and Future Researchmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The research literature also shows that the degree to which inservice and preservice educators believe engineering education is important depends on teaching experience, preservice education, grade level, and subject area (ASEE, 2005;Baker, Yasar-Purzer, Robinson-Kurpius, Krause, & Roberts, 2007;Lambert, Diefes-Dux, Beck, Duncan, Oware, & Nemeth, 2007;Yasar et al, 2006;Hudson, English, & Dawes, 2009). Experienced teachers in science, math, and technology found engineering education to be important (ASEE, 2005;Baker et al, 2007;Lambert et al, 2007).…”
Section: Perceptions Of Engineering and K-12 Engineering Educationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, the study conducted by Yasar et al (2006) indicated that more experienced science teachers were less interested in learning about engineering education. Middle and secondary teachers were more likely to believe that engineering education is important compared to elementary teachers (Yasar et al, 2006;ASEE, 2005;Hudson et al, 2009). Despite of these findings, scholars have argued that the elementary classroom environment is an essential context for implementing K-12 engineering education (Petroski, 2003;Brophy, Klein, Portsmore & Rogers, 2008).…”
Section: Perceptions Of Engineering and K-12 Engineering Educationmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations