2013
DOI: 10.1016/j.future.2012.03.004
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Analysing environmental acoustic data through collaboration and automation

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
46
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
4
2
2

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 61 publications
(49 citation statements)
references
References 22 publications
3
46
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Hence we make use of the following types of test results; A True Positive (TP) (which detects the correct class), A True Negative (TN) (which does not detect the class when it is absent), A False Positive (FP) (which detects the class even if it is absent), and A False Negative (FN) (which detects the wrong class). Using these types of test results we define two performance metric as appear in Table II namely (3) and (4) Recall (Sensitivity) relates to the test's ability to identify a class correctly and Precision (Predictive value positive) is the proportion of positives that correspond to the presence of the class. There may be a problem in identification using this algorithm, when two or more birds sing simultaneously with comparable amount of intensity captured by recording device.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Hence we make use of the following types of test results; A True Positive (TP) (which detects the correct class), A True Negative (TN) (which does not detect the class when it is absent), A False Positive (FP) (which detects the class even if it is absent), and A False Negative (FN) (which detects the wrong class). Using these types of test results we define two performance metric as appear in Table II namely (3) and (4) Recall (Sensitivity) relates to the test's ability to identify a class correctly and Precision (Predictive value positive) is the proportion of positives that correspond to the presence of the class. There may be a problem in identification using this algorithm, when two or more birds sing simultaneously with comparable amount of intensity captured by recording device.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Jason Wimmer et al [4] used approach of building comparatively few recognizers capable of recognizing generic features such as oscillations, whistles, whips and stacked harmonics without building a universal classifier. MFCC features followed by HMM were found suitable only for high quality single-syllable calls.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Finally, problems can arise from participants engaging in activities which target popular species, limiting the inferences that can be made about the wider ecosystems [21]. For example, birds and amphibians are considered indicator species for assessing environmental health [6], which creates additional value for their surveying. This brings to question how potential participants' time should be most effectively used when surveying.…”
Section: A Social Implications Of Citizen Sciencementioning
confidence: 99%
“…With this constraint in mind, there is a trend in utilizing the available computational power on smartphones for more localized classification. This type of automated classification is a paradigm shift for many naturalists [6], which highlights the need to better understand the implications and impact of the technology. As a first step towards this, we consider the wider social impact of citizen science technology on both curators and participants.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Researchers can process acoustic data multiple times for varying purposes, whereas information from traditional surveys retains any bias or errors in the original observation (Wimmer, Towsey, Planitz, Williamson, & Roe, 2012). Arrays of acoustic sensors enable direction detection (Blumstein et al, 2011), and the sound recordings are of a reasonable size to store and manage.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%