2019
DOI: 10.1016/j.jmathb.2019.01.006
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Analysing engineering students’ understanding of integration to propose a genetic decomposition

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

1
10
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
3

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 15 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 13 publications
1
10
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Responses at N level (no response): ST13 did not attempt question 1c (i) which is an indication that he operated at the N level. The student could have faced trouble with limit and series notation (Brijlall & Ndlazi, 2019;Earls, 2017). Specifically, the student did not appear to think of the limit of a series as a limit of partial sums.…”
Section: Rmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Responses at N level (no response): ST13 did not attempt question 1c (i) which is an indication that he operated at the N level. The student could have faced trouble with limit and series notation (Brijlall & Ndlazi, 2019;Earls, 2017). Specifically, the student did not appear to think of the limit of a series as a limit of partial sums.…”
Section: Rmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This contribution to the field of the learning of undergraduate mathematics is one of the strong traits of APOS theory. Similar studies effectively formulated the modified GDs: Brijlall & Ndlazi (2017) explored preservice teachers' mental constructions of the concepts of injections, surjections and bijections and in another study (Brijlall & Ndlazi, 2019) presented a modified GD for integration techniques.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Integral is one of the most important concepts of calculus. It is a prerequisite concept for other mathematics concepts and even for other subjects (Brijlall & Ndlaz, 2019;Saepuzaman et al, 2017;Jones, 2013). However, most undergraduate students find that integral is the most difficult concept to learn (Moru & Qhobela, 2019;Hashemi et al, 2019a;Wagner, 2018;Jones et al, 2017;Nursyahidah & Albab, 2017;Li et al, 2017;Sealey, 2014;Tarmizi, 2010;Metaxas, 2007).…”
Section: 10 Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…According to researchers such as Metaxas (2007) and Tall (1993) conceptual understanding does not happen sufficiently and completely in the learning of integral because instructors and students focus on the symbolic aspect rather than graphical (Brijlall & Ndlaz, 2019;Moru & Qhobela, 2019;Wagner, 2018;Li et al, 2017;Tatar & Zengin, 2016), Moreover, there is no connection and relationship between graphical aspect and symbolical aspect through the learning of integral. Hence, students have difficulties in solving problems in integral because they do not use a framework or plan to solve the problems (Brijlall & Ndlaz, 2019;Nursyahidah & Albab, 2017;Li et al, 2017). In addition, they also have difficulties in using their previous knowledge and information in new areas (Villers & Garner, 2008;Mason, 2010;Tarmizi, 2010).…”
Section: 10 Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As they suggest, understanding a mathematical concept involves forming the concept image of it. Brijlall and Ndlazi (2019) have suggested developing the genetic decomposition of a concept (that is suggesting ways of how the concept might be learnt) so that instructors may organise their teaching of the concept for learning to take such a route. The current study was therefore conducted with the purpose of documenting university students' concept images and concept definitions of anti-derivatives, an important idea, applicable in the social sciences.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%