1999
DOI: 10.1086/301115
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Analyses of the Short-Period Cepheid SU Cassiopeiae

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2002
2002
2013
2013

Publication Types

Select...
4
1

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 37 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Before our interferometric works Mérand et al 2006Mérand et al , 2007, the nebula around RS Pup was the only certain case of a direct relationship between a Cepheid and interstellar material. Another Cepheid, SU Cas, also appears close to a reflection nebula (Milone et al 1999;Turner & Evans 1984), but the physical association is more uncertain. The nebulosity around RS Pup was discovered by Westerlund (1961).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Before our interferometric works Mérand et al 2006Mérand et al , 2007, the nebula around RS Pup was the only certain case of a direct relationship between a Cepheid and interstellar material. Another Cepheid, SU Cas, also appears close to a reflection nebula (Milone et al 1999;Turner & Evans 1984), but the physical association is more uncertain. The nebulosity around RS Pup was discovered by Westerlund (1961).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The implied mean radius of SU Cas according to the Cepheid period–radius relation of Turner et al (2010), which is tied to the almost identical slopes for the Cepheid period–radius relation in studies by Gieren, Barnes & Moffett (1989), Laney & Stobie (1995), Gieren, Fouqué & Gómez (1998) and Turner & Burke (2002), is 25.0 R ⊙ . By comparison, the surface brightness technique yields a mean radius of 28.0 ± 0.8 R ⊙ , while an independent Baade–Wesselink analysis using infrared colours by Milone, Wilson & Volk (1999) produced an estimate of 33.0 ± 1.1 R ⊙ . The last study also summarizes previous estimates for the mean radius of SU Cas derived from variants of the Baade–Wesselink method, most of which lie in the range 30–45 R ⊙ .…”
Section: Su Cas As a Member Of Alessi 95mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The last study also summarizes previous estimates for the mean radius of SU Cas derived from variants of the Baade–Wesselink method, most of which lie in the range 30–45 R ⊙ . Systematic effects cannot be discounted, given the small amplitude of the light variations in SU Cas and the fact that Milone et al (1999) adopted a projection factor of p = 1.39 in their study. Laney & Joner (2009) find a value of p = 1.277 to be more suitable for SU Cas, which would reduce the Milone et al (1999) value to 30.3 ± 1.0 R ⊙ .…”
Section: Su Cas As a Member Of Alessi 95mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations