2020
DOI: 10.1109/access.2020.3031502
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Analyses of Pinned Photodiodes With High Resistivity Epitaxial Layer for Indirect Time-of-Flight Applications

Abstract: This paper analyzes the performance of pinned photodiode (PPD) for Time-of-Flight(ToF) applications on high resistivity epitaxial wafers. Due to its wide depletion region, high epitaxial resistivity PPDs feature some key advantages in collecting photogenerated charges. This paper compares the demodulation contrast of the same pixel design on epitaxial wafers with different resistivity at near-infrared wavelength to analyze their performance. By comparing the simulated profile of pixels with different epitaxial… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
1
1

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 22 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…To be 27 efficient, NIR detection with silicon needs significantly thicker 28 photosensitive layer than what standard CIS fabrication usually 29 allows. Therefore, some studies have investigated a detector 30 with a thicker active layer in silicon [14,15], making the photo-31 sensitive layer going deeper in the silicon with high resistivity 32 epitaxial layer [16,17] or by applying a negative voltage at the 33 back of the photodiode [12] . Unfortunately, these solutions re- extensively studied [18][19][20][21].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To be 27 efficient, NIR detection with silicon needs significantly thicker 28 photosensitive layer than what standard CIS fabrication usually 29 allows. Therefore, some studies have investigated a detector 30 with a thicker active layer in silicon [14,15], making the photo-31 sensitive layer going deeper in the silicon with high resistivity 32 epitaxial layer [16,17] or by applying a negative voltage at the 33 back of the photodiode [12] . Unfortunately, these solutions re- extensively studied [18][19][20][21].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%