1992
DOI: 10.1051/jp4:19921243
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Analyse Spectrale Et Analyse Chaotique Des Ronflements

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

1
2
0

Year Published

1998
1998
1998
1998

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

0
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(3 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
1
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…As a consequence, these simulations are expected to be reliable for quadrupole fluctuations or for dynamical situations dominated by quadrupole fluctuations, so that a restriction to the "collective" fluctuations is reasonable. As shown in [17] grid simulations in restricted model space indeed validate quadrupole fluctuations as calculated in the projection method used here (see table 1 of [17]). In turn, differences show up in the high momentum tail of the distribution function, which are, as expected, not necessary accounted for in a multipole-based method of reinjection of fluctuations.…”
Section: Qmd and Blsupporting
confidence: 75%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…As a consequence, these simulations are expected to be reliable for quadrupole fluctuations or for dynamical situations dominated by quadrupole fluctuations, so that a restriction to the "collective" fluctuations is reasonable. As shown in [17] grid simulations in restricted model space indeed validate quadrupole fluctuations as calculated in the projection method used here (see table 1 of [17]). In turn, differences show up in the high momentum tail of the distribution function, which are, as expected, not necessary accounted for in a multipole-based method of reinjection of fluctuations.…”
Section: Qmd and Blsupporting
confidence: 75%
“…It should be noted that the estimates of [11] rely on a schematic model, built from BL simulations based on quadrupole fluctuations. Only characteristics of the quadrupole do serve as inputs of the model, which can thus be considered as numerically safe (see the above discussions on [17] and internal checks, for example with respect to BUU, as presented in [11]). The model of [11] is thus, by construction, highly collective: it presumably exhausts a sizeable part of the collective source of kaon yield.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation