1980
DOI: 10.1007/bf00625497
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Analyse perturbative des caract�ristiques de propagation des fibres optiques � gradient d'indice quasi-parabolique

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

1981
1981
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 13 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 28 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…It is well known that any deviation of the refractive * Corresponding author: katarzyna.krupa@unibs.it index profile of a GRIN MMF from the ideal parabolic shape has direct consequences on the spacing among propagation constants of its modes [20][21][22]. In this work, we show that this simple consideration has dramatic consequences on the mode selection properties of parametric sidebands, as a result of the disruption of the collective self-imaging effect, which is a typical characteristic of multimode wave propagation in ideal GRIN fibers.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It is well known that any deviation of the refractive * Corresponding author: katarzyna.krupa@unibs.it index profile of a GRIN MMF from the ideal parabolic shape has direct consequences on the spacing among propagation constants of its modes [20][21][22]. In this work, we show that this simple consideration has dramatic consequences on the mode selection properties of parametric sidebands, as a result of the disruption of the collective self-imaging effect, which is a typical characteristic of multimode wave propagation in ideal GRIN fibers.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In addition, complex numerical techniques must be subjected to rigorous comparison and testing with respect to other independent methods, if spurious, meaningless or plain wrong results are to be eliminated. [Meunier et al, 1980;Rosenbaum and Coren, 1980] perturbation methods have been considered. These generally involve the representation of true profiles as perturbations from a suitably defined canonical profile, usually quadratic (a = 2), the strength of perturbation being parameterised by a small number, e (say).…”
Section: Numerical Methods Power Series Linear Multistep Integratiomentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For an arbitrary refractive index profile, one solves the scalar wave equation numerically [4][5][6][7][8] or uses approximate methods, such as, the perturbation method [9,10], the WKBJ method [11] or the variational method [12][13][14][15][16][17][18][19][20][21]. Literatures reveal that of all the approximate methods, the variational method is the most preferred one as it provides a highly accurate analytical expression for the modal field which result into simple closed form expressions for the parameters of interest stated above.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%