Analyse de la douleur urétrale lors de la pratique de l’autosondage : étude rétrospective sur 77 patients

Turmel, Nicolas; Hentzen, Claire; Miget, Gabriel; Chesnel, C.; Charlanes, A.; Breton, F. Le; Tan, E.; Amarenco, G.

doi:10.1016/j.purol.2019.04.005

Cited by 5 publications

(4 citation statements)

References 12 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Unclassified

Order By: Relevance

“…Women also report pain because they find it difficult to immediately identify the urethral meatus and to advance the catheter in an anatomically oriented manner during the catheterisation. 27 This study showed no difference between men and women in mean total ICDQ scores. Our results are supported by other studies, although we could assume that men present more problems with CISC than women due to anatomical differences.…”

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 50%

“…Pain is a sensory and unpleasant emotional experience and, generally, is a limiting factor of activities, whatever their type. 27 Regarding the prevalence of pain according to gender, one would expect the majority of men, but that is not the case. Women also report pain because they find it difficult to immediately identify the urethral meatus and to advance the catheter in an anatomically oriented manner during the catheterisation.…”

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

See 2 more Smart Citations

Translation and Validation of the Intermittent Catheterization Difficulty Questionnaire (ICDQ) into Greek

Zachariou¹,

Zachariou²,

Kaltsas³

et al. 2022

JMDH

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Clean intermittent self-catheterization (CISC) is a safe and effective alternative to managing incomplete bladder emptying in patients afflicted with neurogenic bladder conditions. The Intermittent Catheterisation Difficulty Questionnaire (ICDQ) is a validated questionnaire concerning the assessment of catheter use and patient difficulties during CISC. The present study aimed to translate and validate the ICDQ into the Greek language. A subsequent outcome was to substantiate the requirement of both urologist consultation with patients undergoing CISC and the detailed evaluation of various therapeutic options with the consultation of other specialist physicians. Material and Methods:The study was undertaken between March 2022 and July 2022 and involved patients in an outpatient department of a Rehabilitation Centre. Sixty-two neurologic patients suffering from spinal cord injury (SCI), multiple sclerosis (MS), cauda equina (CE), and myelitis represented a convenience sample. To calculate test-retest reliability, patients filled out two consecutive questionnaires; an initial one and a second after one week. The socio and demographic circumstances of all participants were evaluated. Results: The mean ICDQ total score at the test and retest was 5.96±1.28 (mean total score ± standard deviation) and 5.91±1.29, respectively. Evaluation of the data concerning alterations between men and women did not reveal statistically significant differences. Cronbach's alpha coefficient was 0.94, which proves the inter-correlation between the different topics. An ICC of 0.97 indicated very high intra-rater reliability. Conclusion: ICDQ, a valid and reliable self-administered screening tool for CISC difficulties faced by patients using this procedure regularly, was successfully translated and validated into Greek. A more detailed evaluation and understanding of these difficulties would enhance the quality of CISC and allow for more suitable treatment and the selection of catheter types used. These improved treatment strategies are possible as repeated use and constant comparison of ICDQ scores determine treatment impact, facilitating treatment regimen modification, should it be required.

show abstract

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 50%

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

See 1 more Smart Citation

Translation and Validation of the Intermittent Catheterization Difficulty Questionnaire (ICDQ) into Greek

Zachariou¹,

Zachariou²,

Kaltsas³

et al. 2022

JMDH

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…У 87% она была незначительной, у 10% -средней степени тяжести и 3% отмечало сильный болевой синдром и связанные с ним трудности в выполнении процедуры. По данным N. Turmel et al, (2019) женщины отмечают болезненность при ПК значительно чаще, что также ассоциировано с избыточным весом [39].…”

Section: Review Articlesunclassified

Compliance of patients to clean intermittent self-catheterization after spinal cord injury

Salyukov,

Riger,

Frolova

et al. 2023

Vestn. Urol.

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Clean intermittent self-catheterisation (CISC) was for many years considered the most preferable method to drain the bladder in patients with lower urinary tract disfunction. However, concerning long-term CISC, the adherence rate to the method was limited due to complications, psychological barriers, physical disabilities and social disadaptation. According to results of last studies hydrophilic catheters decrease the prevalence of recurrent urinary tract infections (UTIs) and urethral trauma. Thereby patients with voiding difficulties after spinal cord injury (SCI) could gain a better quality of life and acceptance of CISC. New coated catheters improved self-catheterisation techniques, personalised management, and better access to help and advice reduced the frequency of side effects. Furthermore, the percentage of unsatisfied patients who rejected the method fell. Consequently, CICS remains the most useable clean technique to drain the bladder regarding neuro-urological patients. Most of physicians have already admitted, that CICS seems to be a safe and easy-to-learn method. In this review we aimed to analyze all pros and cons of CICS relating to patients with lower urinary tract dysfunction after SCI.

show abstract

Barriers affecting patient adherence to intermittent self-catheterisation

Balhi¹,

Arfaoui

2021

Br J Community Nurs

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Intermittent self-catheterisation (ISC) is now considered the standard of care for most patients with neurological conditions and associated lower urinary tract disorders. Numerous societies, led by the International Continence Society, are in agreement on the effectiveness of ISC. Use of intermittent catheters is reported to reduce the risk of catheter-associated urinary tract infection compared with indwelling urinary catheters while improving patient comfort and quality of life. However, previous studies have shown that, despite the benefits of ISC, it will not guarantee behavior change and the integration of this procedure into the daily life of patients. Patients may encounter internal (related to the patient themselves) and external (related to their environment) difficulties. Identifying these obstacles early will help promoting ISC success. This review aims to identify internal and external barriers related to ISC and to propose adequate solutions to avoid them.

show abstract

Analyse de la douleur urétrale lors de la pratique de l’autosondage : étude rétrospective sur 77 patients

Cited by 5 publications

References 12 publications

Translation and Validation of the Intermittent Catheterization Difficulty Questionnaire (ICDQ) into Greek

Translation and Validation of the Intermittent Catheterization Difficulty Questionnaire (ICDQ) into Greek

Compliance of patients to clean intermittent self-catheterization after spinal cord injury

Barriers affecting patient adherence to intermittent self-catheterisation

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About