2013
DOI: 10.1017/s1360674312000329
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Analogy in the emergence of intrusive-rin English

Abstract: This article presents a novel approach to the phenomenon of intrusive-r in English based on analogy. The main claim of the article is that intrusive-r in non-rhotic dialects of English is the result of the analogical extension of the r~zero alternation shown by words such as far, more and dear. While this idea has been around for a long time, this is the first study that explores this type of analysis in detail. Specifically, I provide an overview of the developments that led to the emergence of intrusive-r an… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0
1

Year Published

2016
2016
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
2

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 46 publications
(106 reference statements)
0
5
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Within this more functional, usage-based framework, every linguistic item in the lexicon consists of a cloud of phonetic exemplars containing detailed information about the context in which they are used. In this view, /r/-sandhi tokens would not be the result of deletion or insertion rules, but rather the result of how entrenched or lexicalised /r/ is in specific utterances (Hay & Sudbury 2005, Mompean & Mompeán-Guillamón 2009, Hay & Maclagan 2012, Sóskuthy 2013, Pavlík 2016. The more frequent a collocation including a potential /r/-sandhi is, the more likely it is that /r/ will become lexicalised in it and thus be produced.…”
Section: Qeii and Factors Conditioning /R/-sandhi Usagementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Within this more functional, usage-based framework, every linguistic item in the lexicon consists of a cloud of phonetic exemplars containing detailed information about the context in which they are used. In this view, /r/-sandhi tokens would not be the result of deletion or insertion rules, but rather the result of how entrenched or lexicalised /r/ is in specific utterances (Hay & Sudbury 2005, Mompean & Mompeán-Guillamón 2009, Hay & Maclagan 2012, Sóskuthy 2013, Pavlík 2016. The more frequent a collocation including a potential /r/-sandhi is, the more likely it is that /r/ will become lexicalised in it and thus be produced.…”
Section: Qeii and Factors Conditioning /R/-sandhi Usagementioning
confidence: 99%
“…61 This variable describes the excrescence of a nonetymological /r/ to break up the hiatus between a nonhigh vowel and a following vowel. This is generally understood to be a consequence of the loss of rhoticity and so cannot be dated any later than that sound change [188]; the earliest evidence for the sound change is from Sheridan ([189] cf., [190]), so we cannot assume an age for this variable of greater than 150 years.…”
Section: Appendix E: Description Of Variablesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A este respecto, tendremos que tomar en cuenta -me-17 Ya se encuentran en p. ej. Lloyd 1987: 46-49 + 222, Tuten 2003: 132-136, Jodl 2015, 2013, Mishima 2016.…”
Section: Discusión De La Fuerza Explicativa De Las Metáforasunclassified