2011
DOI: 10.3758/s13421-011-0154-4
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Analogical transfer in perceptual categorization

Abstract: Analogical transfer is the ability to transfer knowledge despite significant changes in the surface features of a problem. In categorization, analogical transfer occurs if a classification strategy learned with one set of stimuli can be transferred to a set of novel, perceptually distinct stimuli. Three experiments investigated analogical transfer in rule-based and information-integration categorization tasks. In rule-based tasks, the optimal strategy is easy to describe verbally, whereas in information-integr… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

5
61
1

Year Published

2013
2013
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
7
1
1

Relationship

2
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 49 publications
(67 citation statements)
references
References 49 publications
5
61
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Under this view, intentional processes might be necessary both during acquisition to encode the repeating elements and also during test to retrieve those elements and apply them to the test string at hand. Indeed, Cásale, Roeder, and Ashby (2012) found almost perfect analogical transfer in rule-based tasks believed to rely heavily on explicit hypothesistesting, and no evidence of analogical transfer in implicit information-integration tasks. Given the presumed reliance on intentional processing, we might expect a dual-task to severely impair transfer performance to the extent that it relies upon abstract analogy leaming.…”
Section: Experiments 2: Effects Of a Working Memory Dualtask On Transfmentioning
confidence: 96%
“…Under this view, intentional processes might be necessary both during acquisition to encode the repeating elements and also during test to retrieve those elements and apply them to the test string at hand. Indeed, Cásale, Roeder, and Ashby (2012) found almost perfect analogical transfer in rule-based tasks believed to rely heavily on explicit hypothesistesting, and no evidence of analogical transfer in implicit information-integration tasks. Given the presumed reliance on intentional processing, we might expect a dual-task to severely impair transfer performance to the extent that it relies upon abstract analogy leaming.…”
Section: Experiments 2: Effects Of a Working Memory Dualtask On Transfmentioning
confidence: 96%
“…This prevents participants from keeping the stimulus they had just seen available in iconic memory as reinforcement arrives (Maddox, Ashby, & Bohil, 2003; Maddox, Bohil, & Ing, 2004; Nomura, et al, 2007). Others have not deemed this mask necessary (Ashby & Crossley, 2010; Casale, Roeder, & Ashby, 2012; Smith, Beran, Crossley, Boomer, & Ashby, 2010). …”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In practice, this means that new knowledge is compared with already existing neural patterns and that the visual system organizes a multiplicity of data in stable, delimited, simplified structures. These basic classifications of thoughts and behaviours are organized in complex schemas, which enable analogue transmission and recognition of common experiences and semantic preferences, which can be maintained in relatively stable frameworks (Casale et al, 2012). This also means that the moment when certain cognitive categori zations become well-established, it can be extremely difficult to think 'beyond them' because the neurons firing within these schemas can be very strong, just as the different schemata can be deeply embedded in each other.…”
Section: Inertia In Distributed Classificatory Processesmentioning
confidence: 99%