2017
DOI: 10.24016/2017.v3n2.74
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Análisis psicométrico de la Escala de Satisfacción Laboral de Warr, Cook y Wall en una muestra multiocupacional de Arequipa, Perú

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
2
0
3

Year Published

2019
2019
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 17 publications
1
2
0
3
Order By: Relevance
“…However, the three factors were highly correlated, so they recommended the use of the JSS as a total score, corroborating the results of our study, although the Global JSS model of these authors comprises 1 factor/15 item (without item 16), and our results reveal better parsimony in the Global model 1 factor/16 items. Arias et al (2017) performed an exploratory and confirmatory factor analysis and confirmed that the JSS has a better adjustment in a Global model 1 factor/15 items (without item 16), similar to Heritage and co-workers' (Heritage et al, 2015) findings. Gonçalves et al (2016), who also translated and validated the JSS into Portuguese, support the use of a general factor of job satisfaction (1 factor/16 item).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 62%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…However, the three factors were highly correlated, so they recommended the use of the JSS as a total score, corroborating the results of our study, although the Global JSS model of these authors comprises 1 factor/15 item (without item 16), and our results reveal better parsimony in the Global model 1 factor/16 items. Arias et al (2017) performed an exploratory and confirmatory factor analysis and confirmed that the JSS has a better adjustment in a Global model 1 factor/15 items (without item 16), similar to Heritage and co-workers' (Heritage et al, 2015) findings. Gonçalves et al (2016), who also translated and validated the JSS into Portuguese, support the use of a general factor of job satisfaction (1 factor/16 item).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 62%
“…Some authors (Heritage et al, 2015;Hills et al, 2012) have analyzed the JSS structure with more sophisticated statistical methods. Using exploratory factor analysis, several authors (Arias, Rivera, & Ceballos, 2017;Boluarte, 2014;Falkum & Vladum, 2005;Heritage et al, 2015;Hills et al, 2012;Morrison, 2004) have developed a single-factor solution that better represents the JSS structure. More recent studies cite the two-factor solution of the JSS provided by the original version, although these recent works were based on the cluster analysis technique (Ose et al, 2010;Solberg et al, 2012;Travers & Cooper, 1993;Turner, Ross, & Ibbetson, 2011), identical to the original authors' approach.…”
Section: Job Satisfaction Scalementioning
confidence: 99%
“…En todo el mundo a través de los años, se han sugerido instrumentos tipo cuestionario que posibilitan la manera de medir cuán satisfecho se encuentra un grupo de individuos, es así como basados en la teoría de Herzberg (1968) se han propuesto agrupar los factores que pueden modificar la satisfacción de una persona: los factores higiénicos y los factores motivacionales. Los factores higiénicos engloban los beneficios o utilidades que obtiene la persona en su lugar de trabajo, tal es el caso del salario, condiciones físicas del lugar, las prácticas administrativas o los beneficios sociales que este pudiera obtener; mientras que los motivacionales aseguran tener un aspecto positivo en cuanto al sentir del empleado, estos pueden ser reconocimientos por el buen desempeño, los logros obtenidos al laborar en la empresa y los desafíos que al individuo le generen satisfacción y reto (Paredes, Alemán y Castro, 2022;Arias, Rivera & Ceballos, 2017).…”
Section: Satisfacción Laboralunclassified
“…In Latin America there is no data reporting which are the most frequent instruments used to assess job satisfaction. However, some studies conducted in this region have adapted a variety of instruments to assess it like the Copenhagen Psychosocial Questionnaire [39] or the Warr-Cook-Wall Job Satisfaction Scale [40]. These studies were conducted on small samples, they were not nationally representative, and they selected instruments that were originally designed in very different healthcare contexts in countries located in the European region.…”
Section: Contrasting Ndings With Existing Literaturementioning
confidence: 99%