2018
DOI: 10.30536/j.pjpdcd.2018.v15.a2800
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Analisis Misalignment Citra Multispektral Terhadap Citra Pankromatik Pada Data Worldview-2

Abstract: The standard data of Worldview-2 owned by LAPAN is Ortho-Ready Standard level 2 (OR2A) data consisting of 4 multispectral bands (blue, green, red, NIR) and one panchromatic band each 2 m and 0,5 m spatial resolution. Both images have different metadata and RPC, making it possible to perform geometric corrections separately. This paper discusses the analysis of the inaccuracies of multispectral image positions to panchromatic images compared to those that have been systematically geometric corrected. The method… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0
1

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
2
1

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 5 publications
0
2
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…It also had a maximum likelihood (ML) of 57%, fuzzy probability of 49%, and belief dempster shafer of only 45% (Nugroho et al, 2012). The accuracy of the FCD SAVI model was 83.67%, while the accuracy of the original FCD model was 84%, according to the results of another study (Nugraha & Citra, 2020). Hence, the overall accuracy of the current study was 90.32%, indicating that the computations used to determine the changes in land cover were reliable.…”
Section: Accuracy Assessmentmentioning
confidence: 53%
“…It also had a maximum likelihood (ML) of 57%, fuzzy probability of 49%, and belief dempster shafer of only 45% (Nugroho et al, 2012). The accuracy of the FCD SAVI model was 83.67%, while the accuracy of the original FCD model was 84%, according to the results of another study (Nugraha & Citra, 2020). Hence, the overall accuracy of the current study was 90.32%, indicating that the computations used to determine the changes in land cover were reliable.…”
Section: Accuracy Assessmentmentioning
confidence: 53%
“…The cause of the different accuracy results because of analysis using additional external data such as land use and sampling with the smallest pixels unit. While the research area on [44] with a value above 78%. But different with Joshi et al [45] only has 49% accuracy with four indicators in FCD Model.…”
Section: Forest Canopy Density (Fcd) Validationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Komponen air yang berbeda memiliki sifat spektral yang berbeda. Respon spektral air dalam spektrum tampak dapat memberikan informasi penting dan efektif tentang zat dalam air (Nurgiantoro et al, 2019).…”
Section: Pendahuluanunclassified