2022
DOI: 10.30598/jupitekvol4iss2pp79-86
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Analisis Kemampuan Berpikir Tingkat Tinggi Siswa Pada Materi Relasi Dan Fungsi Kelas Viii Di SMPN 1 Tanjunganom

Abstract: Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk mengetahui kemampuan berpikir tingkat tinggi siswa pada materi relasi dan fungsi. Jenis penelitian ini adalah penelitian kualitatif dengan subjek penelitian adalah siswa kelas VIII-1 SMPN 1 Tanjunganom Tahun Pelajaran 2020/2021 dengan jumlah siswa 32 orang. Data yang diperoleh dari tes kemampuan berpikir tingkat tinggi (HOTS) dan wawancara. Analisis data yang digunakan berupa analisis taksonomi Bloom. Dari hasil penelitian yang dilakukan oleh peneliti menunjukkan bahwa persentase… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2

Citation Types

2
0
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
2
0
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Where the most mistakes are made, namely in the creating part (C6), none of the students can solve the problem of creating (C6). This research is in accordance with previous research, namely research from [25], but different from research from [26]. Where the percentage results of creating (C6) from [26] amounted to 48.96%, but the researcher only discussed the indicators of parts C4, C5, and C6 not discussing parts C1, C2, and C3.…”
Section: F Creation Error (C6)supporting
confidence: 88%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Where the most mistakes are made, namely in the creating part (C6), none of the students can solve the problem of creating (C6). This research is in accordance with previous research, namely research from [25], but different from research from [26]. Where the percentage results of creating (C6) from [26] amounted to 48.96%, but the researcher only discussed the indicators of parts C4, C5, and C6 not discussing parts C1, C2, and C3.…”
Section: F Creation Error (C6)supporting
confidence: 88%
“…This research is in accordance with previous research, namely research from [25], but different from research from [26]. Where the percentage results of creating (C6) from [26] amounted to 48.96%, but the researcher only discussed the indicators of parts C4, C5, and C6 not discussing parts C1, C2, and C3. In the research from [25] in part C6 obtained the same percentage value of 0% but in part C5 also obtained 0% in contrast to the results of research conducted by researchers.…”
Section: F Creation Error (C6)supporting
confidence: 88%