2022
DOI: 10.5944/rppc.30801
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Análisis de red del Inventario de Crecimiento Postraumático (PTGI-X) en adultos peruanos con familiares fallecidos por COVID-19 en función del sexo

Abstract: Network analysis of the Posttraumatic Growth Inventory (PTGI-X) in Peruvian adults with family members killed by COVID-19 as a function of sex Abstract: Posttraumatic growth network structures were evaluated in males and females who lost a family member to COVID-19 to determine network variations according to sex. Six hundred sixty-nine Peruvian adults (M = 25.41, SD = 1.82) were included using the Posttraumatic Growth Inventory-X (PTGI-X) self-report measure. Two Gaussian plot models of partial correlations w… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 64 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The results identify the Bayes Factor (BF), which has two interpretations: BF10 (in favor of the alternative hypothesis of significant difference) and BF01 (in favor of the null hypothesis of significant difference), along with the 95% confidence intervals and the effect size (Ly et al, 2018). The evidentiary strength of the significance hypotheses was calculated using the Jeffreys criteria for comparative studies: weak, moderate, strong, very strong, and extreme (Ramos-Vera et al, 2021;Ramos-Vera, 2022).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The results identify the Bayes Factor (BF), which has two interpretations: BF10 (in favor of the alternative hypothesis of significant difference) and BF01 (in favor of the null hypothesis of significant difference), along with the 95% confidence intervals and the effect size (Ly et al, 2018). The evidentiary strength of the significance hypotheses was calculated using the Jeffreys criteria for comparative studies: weak, moderate, strong, very strong, and extreme (Ramos-Vera et al, 2021;Ramos-Vera, 2022).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These results show that the partial correlations exhibit weak to moderate effect sizes (Epskamp et al, 2018). As for the centrality values (Figure 2), it was decided to consider the strength centrality because it allows us to recognize the item that has a greater interconnection influence on the other variables (Mcnally, 2021;Ramos-Vera, 2022). In the present network, it was recognized that item 2 (1.46) and item 4 (1.09) had the highest centrality scores, however, the indicator with the lowest strength was item 1 (−1.21).…”
Section: Network Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This approach uses a Gaussian graph to represent the associations (edges; total or partial correlations) existing between the variables (nodes; 19 , 20 ). Furthermore, it includes centrality indices that quantify the topological characteristics of components within the network ( 21 ).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%