Análisis contrastivo de la (des)cortesía en los comentarios digitales del periódico 20minutos.es y del Facebook de viajacontumascota.com: anonimato y comunidad virtual

Sáez, Julia Sanmartín

doi:10.14198/elua2019.33.9

Cited by 3 publications

(2 citation statements)

References 3 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Unclassified

Order By: Relevance

“…In this overview, we focus on the genres discussed in this paper. Facework and (im)politeness have been studied on social networking sites (for a general overview, see, for example, Mancera Rueda 2015) and forums (see Mancera Rueda 2009, Lorenzo-Dus et al 2011, Vigara Tauste & Hernández Toribio 2011, Weizman & Dori-Hacohen 2017, Sanmartín Sáez 2019 as examples of empirical research). In this paper, facework and (im)politeness are analysed through the study of mitigation.…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Mitigation in online interactions on controversial topics: A methodological proposal

Aulit

2023

AFEL

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

This article puts forward a methodological proposal for the pragmatic analysis of mitigation in online written interactions, specifically in discursive genres such as the digital press forums and Twitter. Mitigation is a rhetorical and pragmatic strategy linked to the face needs and communicative goals of the participants in the communication (Albelda Marco & Briz Gómez 2020). For this reason, drawing on the existing literature concerning the selected discursive genres and on an analysis of some contributions about a controversial Spanish tradition, namely the Moors and Christians festivals, this article highlights both situational and linguistic features to be taken into account when analysing mitigation in these genres, and proposes adaptations to Albelda Marco et al.’s (2014) methodology for analysing mitigation in spoken interactions. In doing so, this study presents a methodological proposal directly suitable for analysing mitigation in online interactions in discursive genres such as digital press forums and Twitter.

show abstract

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Mitigation in online interactions on controversial topics: A methodological proposal

Aulit

2023

AFEL

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…Además de estos estudios sobre las características de los comentarios de prensa, aparecieron investigaciones versadas especí camente sobre los fenómenos de (des)cortesía (Mancera Rueda 2009, Vigara Tauste y Hernández Toribio 2011), así como un análisis contrastivo de la (des)cortesía en los comentarios de prensa y las redes sociales (Sanmartín Sáez 2019). Si bien estos estudios mencionan la intensi cación como fenómeno recurrente en este tipo de discurso, como veremos más adelante, investigaciones centradas especí camente en las estrategias lingüísticas empleadas para expresarse de forma intensi cada en los comentarios de prensa escasean, con la excepción de la investigación de Moya Muñoz y Carrió-Pastor (2018) sobre la intensi cación en comentarios sobre temas políticos y deportivos.…”

Section: Introductionunclassified

intensificación en controversias en líneas en español

Aulit

2021

Estud. Rom.

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Esta investigación presenta un análisis de la intensificación en un corpus de comentarios en español a artículos de prensa digitales sobre la fiesta de Moros y Cristianos, una tradición controvertida en España por el tratamiento de ciertos grupos sociales. Basándose en Albelda y Briz (2020), definimos la intensificación como una estrategia retórico-pragmática de argumentación por la que el hablante refuerza lo dicho y/o su intención para lograr más eficazmente sus metas conversacionales en el discurso. Por eso, este artículo se interesa por las estrategias lingüísticas de intensificación empleadas para posicionarse en estas controversias, tomando en cuenta los contextos comunicativos en los que aparecen, así como las funciones que desempeñan respecto a la argumentación y la imagen. A partir de una metodología adaptada de la metodología desarrollada por Albelda et al. (2014), los resultados muestran que la intensificación aparece principalmente en intervenciones que reaccionan a lo dicho anteriormente de forma general para reforzar la expresión de la postura personal del hablante. This article presents an analysis of intensification in a corpus of comments in Spanish to digital press articles about the Moors and Christians festival, a tradition that led to controversies in Spain due to its treatment of certain social groups. Based on Albelda and Briz (2020), intensification is defined as a rhetorical and pragmatic strategy of argumentation whereby the speaker strengthens what he says and/or his intention to achieve more efficiently his conversational goals. Therefore, this paper looks into the linguistic strategies of intensification, taking into consideration the specific interactional contexts in which they appear and the functions they carry out regarding argumentation and face. Based on the methodology developed by Albelda and al. (2014), the results show that intensification appears mainly in moves that respond to the entire discussion in order to strengthen the expression of the personal perspective of the speaker.

show abstract

Degrees of disagreement and reliability of information sources in pro- and anti-vaccination comments on Facebook

Kotwica,

Albelda Marco

2024

JLAC

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

During the COVID-19 vaccination campaign, the Spanish Ministry of Health shared informative posts on platforms like Facebook, sparking heated debates. This paper utilizes a custom corpus of Facebook comments with evidential elements to explore the disagreement and confrontation in online comments from pro- and anti-vaccine advocates. The study also analyses the types of evidence employed by posters to support their positions, revealing potential hierarchies of information sources in terms of reliability and validity. Findings indicate that anti-vaccine advocates (i) engage in stronger disagreement than vaccine supporters; (ii) use disqualification and hostile speech acts slightly more; and (iii) employ more impolite strategies. Moreover, the study shows differences between these two user groups with regard to the sources of the information they chose to use: anti-vaccine posters employ a higher percentage of more objective types of evidence, while pro-vaccine posters resort to evidence based on more subjective, and personal sources.

show abstract

Análisis contrastivo de la (des)cortesía en los comentarios digitales del periódico 20minutos.es y del Facebook de viajacontumascota.com: anonimato y comunidad virtual

Cited by 3 publications

References 3 publications

Mitigation in online interactions on controversial topics: A methodological proposal

Mitigation in online interactions on controversial topics: A methodological proposal

intensificación en controversias en líneas en español

Degrees of disagreement and reliability of information sources in pro- and anti-vaccination comments on Facebook

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About