Análisis comparativo de un cambio fonológico erosivo. Variación de /d/ intervocálica en dos comunidades de habla (Granada y Málaga)

Abstract

Palabras clave: sociolingüística, variación lingüística, análisis cuantitativo, variedades del español de Andalucía.

Factores lingüísticos y extralingüísticos influyentes en la elisión de la /d/ en posición intervocálica en la comarca de Mérida (España)

“…Por otra parte, para conocer las influencias lingüísticas y sociales que pueden incidir en la elisión de la /d/ en posición intervocálica, desde el proyecto PRESEEA (2011) se han establecido una serie de factores que permiten, primero, realizar análisis completos que arrojen luz sobre la actualidad lingüística del fenómeno y, segundo, presentar comparaciones entre las zonas estudiadas con el fin de analizar comportamientos de la dental en diversas áreas del español (Malaver y Samper Padilla, 2016). De esta forma, a partir de los trabajos realizados sobre Madrid (Molina Martos y Paredes García, 2014), Valencia (Gómez Molina, 2013), Granada y Málaga (Moya Corral, 2009;Villena Ponsoda, 2012;Villena Ponsoda y Moya Corral, 2016), se pueden advertir algunas tendencias generales sobre la elisión de la /d/.…”

Individual differences in the acquisition of language-specific and dialect-specific allophones of intervocalic /d/ by L2 and heritage Spanish speakers studying abroad in Sevilla

“…Although intervocalic /d/ elision is not unique to Andalusian Spanish nor a recent development (Moreno-Fernández, 2004, p. 999), it is frequent in Andalusian Spanish (Narbona et al, 1998, p. 93). Sociolinguists have analyzed intervocalic /d/ throughout Andalucía finding overall elision rates between 23–36% in Córdoba, Granada, and Málaga (Uruburu, 1996; Moya-Corral & García-Wiedemann, 2009; Villena-Ponsoda, 2012; Villena-Ponsoda & Moya-Corral, 2016) with rates as high as 68% in Jerez (Harjus, 2018). These studies found social patterns in which younger generations, men, those with less educational attainment, and more informal speech styles most favored elision.…”

“…Several linguistic factors also govern this realization in which atonic syllables, posttonic syllables, and priming effects of prior /d/ elisions favor [∅]. The strongest linguistic predictor, however, is grammatical category in which the past participle morpheme /ado/ ( exagerado ‘exaggerated’) most favors elision, followed by other morphemes such as /ada/ ( relejada ‘relaxed’) or /ido/ ( salido ‘left’/‘exited’), while root morphemes 5 ( cada ‘each’) are more likely to favor retention (Moya-Corral & García-Wiedemann, 2009; Villena-Ponsoda, 2012; Villena-Ponsoda & Moya-Corral, 2016). When only considering the /ado/ context, elision rates rise to 86.3% in Granada and 85.7% in Málaga (Villena-Ponsoda & Moya-Corral, 2016).…”

“…The strongest linguistic predictor, however, is grammatical category in which the past participle morpheme /ado/ ( exagerado ‘exaggerated’) most favors elision, followed by other morphemes such as /ada/ ( relejada ‘relaxed’) or /ido/ ( salido ‘left’/‘exited’), while root morphemes 5 ( cada ‘each’) are more likely to favor retention (Moya-Corral & García-Wiedemann, 2009; Villena-Ponsoda, 2012; Villena-Ponsoda & Moya-Corral, 2016). When only considering the /ado/ context, elision rates rise to 86.3% in Granada and 85.7% in Málaga (Villena-Ponsoda & Moya-Corral, 2016). Thus, although intervocalic /d/ elision is common in Andalusian Spanish, the /ado/ context provides an even higher frequency of elision.…”