Análisis comparativo de los marcadores de compromiso en los comentarios sobre noticias digitales en España y Chile

Self-mentions (i.e., first person pronouns and self-citations) have proven to be one of the most powerful ways of rhetorical self-projection in academic discourse and their role in the construction of a self that engenders credibility in more overtly persuasive genres, such as political debates, has been extensively studied, given the vast literature on pronouns in political discourse analysis and specifically on their uses in political debates. To gain a better insight into the ways in which politicians can build a credible ethos through a competent and authoritative presentation of themselves in electoral debates, this paper compares the frequency and rhetorical roles of the self-mentions used by the candidates of the two major political parties (i.e., Democrats and Republicans) during the debates held for the United States presidential election of 2016. The Republican candidates (i.e., Trump and Pence) were found to make a notably greater use of selfmentions than their Democratic counterparts (i.e., Clinton and Kaine). Significant differences were also found in the rhetorical roles most commonly adopted by each politician to convey authority through the use of exclusive pronouns and self-citations.

show abstract

Marcadores de implicación en los discursos de campaña para las elecciones generales de 2016 en España

Pastor

Albalat-Mascarell

2022

SiC

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Abstracta Este trabajo estudia la frecuencia y las funciones de los marcadores de implicación que utilizaron los candidatos de las principales fuerzas políticas españolas en sus discursos de campaña para las elecciones generales de 2016 en España. Nuestro objetivo es analizar la manera en que los líderes de los principales partidos políticos españoles se relacionaron con sus votantes a través del uso de marcadores de implicación en sus discursos. Para poder alcanzar este objetivo, recopilamos las transcripciones de los mítines de los candidatos presidenciables españoles y de un debate celebrado entre dichos candidatos durante la campaña electoral de 2016 y aplicamos una metodología de análisis de corpus. Los resultados permiten observar que los dirigentes políticos españoles utilizaron los marcadores de implicación de manera distinta según se tratase de un mitin de campaña o de un debate televisado. En las conclusiones señalamos qué marcadores de implicación parecen utilizarse más en la comunicación político-electoral española en la actualidad y las implicaciones que esto conlleva.

show abstract

scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.

Contact Info

hi@scite.ai

10624 S. Eastern Ave., Ste. A-614

Henderson, NV 89052, USA

Blog Terms and Conditions API Terms Privacy Policy Contact Cookie Preferences Do Not Sell or Share My Personal Information

Made with 💙 for researchers

Part of the Research Solutions Family.

Análisis comparativo de los marcadores de compromiso en los comentarios sobre noticias digitales en España y Chile

Cited by 3 publications

References 13 publications

The assessment of metadiscourse devices in English as a foreign language

The assessment of metadiscourse devices in English as a foreign language

Self-representation in political campaign talk: A functional metadiscourse approach to self-mentions in televised presidential debates

Marcadores de implicación en los discursos de campaña para las elecciones generales de 2016 en España

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About