2021
DOI: 10.36367/ntqr.8.2021.505-513
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Análise qualitativa mediada pelo software IRaMuTeQ: Interpretações a partir do ontem e do hoje no Sistema Único de Saúde do Brasil

Abstract: Resumo:Introdução: O ponto central é o Sistema Único de Saúde do Brasil, a maior política de inclusão social da história brasileira. Debruça-se sobre as percepções de pessoas que vivenciaram a saúde brasileira antes e após a implantação do sistema. Objetivo: O objetivo foi apresentar nuances analíticas da Análise Textual Discursiva apoiada pelo software IRaMuTeQ sobre as vivências de cidadãos brasileiros acerca do ontem e do hoje do Sistema Único de Saúde. Método: É uma pesquisa de abordagem qualitativa. Os pa… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

1
0

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(1 citation statement)
references
References 8 publications
(23 reference statements)
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Based on the spatial arrangement, there are seven types of associations between the intermediate categories, five of dependence and two of independence. Thus, it is possible to identify three levels of intensity for the associations: i) very low; ii) moderate; and iii) pronounced ( 30 ) . When analyzing the associations between the intermediate categories ( Figure 1 ), it is possible to observe the formation of seven sets.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Based on the spatial arrangement, there are seven types of associations between the intermediate categories, five of dependence and two of independence. Thus, it is possible to identify three levels of intensity for the associations: i) very low; ii) moderate; and iii) pronounced ( 30 ) . When analyzing the associations between the intermediate categories ( Figure 1 ), it is possible to observe the formation of seven sets.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%