Anais Do XXXIV Simpósio Brasileiro De Banco De Dados (SBBD 2019) 2019
DOI: 10.5753/sbbd.2019.8809
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Análise Integrada de Grafos de Proveniência Heterogêneos por meio de uma Abordagem PolyStore

Abstract: Dados de proveniência de um workflow são capturados por quase todos os Sistemas de Gerência de Workflows (SGWfs) existentes. Cada SGWf utiliza um formato próprio para representar tais dados, e, comumente, captura e armazena os dados em diferentes granularidades na forma de um grafo. Isso permite cientistas analisarem e validarem resultados de um workflow específico. Entretanto, em cenários mais complexos em que o cientista necessita analisar grafos de proveniência oriundos de múltiplos SGWfs e workflows, um de… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
0
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

0
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(1 citation statement)
references
References 16 publications
0
0
0
Order By: Relevance
“…And finally, we have conducted a range of experiments to evaluate Polyflow with experts. This article is an extension of the conference paper [Mendes et al 2019] published in the Proceedings of the 2019 Brazilian Symposium on Databases (SBBD). This extended version provides new empirical shreds of evidence regarding the proposed approach, an evaluation of the approach with experts and a broader discussion on related work.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…And finally, we have conducted a range of experiments to evaluate Polyflow with experts. This article is an extension of the conference paper [Mendes et al 2019] published in the Proceedings of the 2019 Brazilian Symposium on Databases (SBBD). This extended version provides new empirical shreds of evidence regarding the proposed approach, an evaluation of the approach with experts and a broader discussion on related work.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%