2018
DOI: 10.1590/0104-9224/si2304.05
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Análise das Causas de Variação Atribuídas a Diferentes Instrumentos Metrológicos para Verificação das Características Geométricas de um Processo de Soldagem por Pontos

Abstract: Resumo Neste estudo, buscou-se analisar a variabilidade de instrumentos utilizados na indústria para avaliar as características geométricas de um ponto de solda. Para tal, inicialmente, utilizou-se da técnica de planejamento de experimentos para gerar um arranjo fatorial fracionado para as configurações dos parâmetros de soldagem em corpos de prova de aços galvanizados por imersão a quente, a fim de representar a amplitude real do processo de soldagem por pontos. Para as análises, utilizou-se o estudo de repe… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

1
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 59 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…These indicators are described respectively in Eqs. (21) and (22). The evaluation criteria are the same as those described in Table 4, based on the AIAG [31].…”
Section: ( ) ( )mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…These indicators are described respectively in Eqs. (21) and (22). The evaluation criteria are the same as those described in Table 4, based on the AIAG [31].…”
Section: ( ) ( )mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…All measurements were performed randomly, adapted from [17] and available in Table 7. The ID measurement was performed on the upper face of the specimen, for it presents a higher indentation depth value, according to the specification suggested by Almeida et al [22]. This article has been accepted for publication in a future issue of this journal, but has not been fully edited.…”
Section: Numerical Example: a Rsw Processmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation