2019
DOI: 10.34115/basrv3n4-014
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Análise da hidroxilação de magnésia cáustica em moinho e reator CSTR

Abstract: Análise da hidroxilação de magnésia cáustica em moinho e reator CSTR Analysis of caustic magnesia hydroxilation in CSTR reactor and mil

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

0
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(4 citation statements)
references
References 2 publications
(5 reference statements)
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Preparation of magnesium hydroxide pulps: the HM pulps have been produced in a reactor mill under optimum operating conditions [18]: feed: caustic magnesia suspension varying from 25 to 30 wt% and 0.2 mol/L acetic acid (Labsynth, Brazil); initial temperature=25 °C; operating time=5 h. The reactor mill equipment had an internal volume corresponding to 2.0 L with a diameter of 0.12 m and a height of 0.18 m. Caustic magnesia came from two different Brazilian mineral sources: magnesia A with 91% of MgO and magnesia B with 99% of MgO. HM pulps left the reactor mill in the pH range from 11 to 12 (11.8 on average) and remained at this range due to the buffer effect of HM suspensions [18]. HM-A and HM-B pulps were produced for each test performed since they were reactive and hence could not be stored and/or processed for more than 3 h (stable time scale) at 25 °C.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…Preparation of magnesium hydroxide pulps: the HM pulps have been produced in a reactor mill under optimum operating conditions [18]: feed: caustic magnesia suspension varying from 25 to 30 wt% and 0.2 mol/L acetic acid (Labsynth, Brazil); initial temperature=25 °C; operating time=5 h. The reactor mill equipment had an internal volume corresponding to 2.0 L with a diameter of 0.12 m and a height of 0.18 m. Caustic magnesia came from two different Brazilian mineral sources: magnesia A with 91% of MgO and magnesia B with 99% of MgO. HM pulps left the reactor mill in the pH range from 11 to 12 (11.8 on average) and remained at this range due to the buffer effect of HM suspensions [18]. HM-A and HM-B pulps were produced for each test performed since they were reactive and hence could not be stored and/or processed for more than 3 h (stable time scale) at 25 °C.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Samples were taken from these pulps to determine: i) solid concentration, C s (=m s /m susp ), by measuring the sample mass (m susp ) and the solids mass (m s ), which was made after washing the sample with acetone R.G. (Labsynth, Brazil) and drying it in an oven (Med-Clave, LTE Scient., UK) at 120 °C for 2 h; ii) magnesium hydroxide concentration in dry basis, X HM =m HM /m s (HM mass/ solid mass), by calculating m HM as a sum of the HM mass generated by the MgO hydration reaction plus one already presented in the precursor sample [18]. Mass measurements were made in a high-precision analytical balance (AY220, Shimadzu, USA) in triplicate.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations