Análise da força de mordida nos diferentes tipos de maloclusões dentárias, segundo Angle

Araújo, Sarah Cueva Candido Soares de; Vieira, Marilena Manno; Gasparotto, Christiane Aparecida; Bommarito, Silvana

doi:10.1590/1982-021620145113

Cited by 12 publications

(12 citation statements)

References 14 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…In contrast to the current study, Sathyanarayana et al 14 found that the sagittal morphology does not significantly affect the MVMBF value; consistent with the current study, however, they found a significant correlation with the vertical morphology. In agreement with the current study, de Ara ujo et al 15 also found that the type of occlusion influenced the MVMBF. The authors reported that the number of occlusal contacts determined the chewing efficiency and that chewing was less efficient in patients with malocclusion than normal occlusion.…”

Section: Discussionsupporting

confidence: 93%

“…According to these values, the calculated Cohen's d and effect-size r were 0.887 and 0.405, respectively. 15 The software used in that study was G*Power software version 3.0.10 with power of 80%, a of 0.05, and effect size (d) of 0.4. 15 The total sample in the present cross-sectional study was determined to be 102.…”

Section: Methodsmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…15 The software used in that study was G*Power software version 3.0.10 with power of 80%, a of 0.05, and effect size (d) of 0.4. 15 The total sample in the present cross-sectional study was determined to be 102. Only patients with a full complement of permanent teeth were included in the study.…”

Section: Methodsmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…5 Moreover, research has been performed to compare patients with normal occlusion and different Angle malocclusions, to analyze the frequency of occurrence of each type of occlusion, and to identify any disparities between force and body mass index-associated bite force. 15 In another study, whether appliance type affects changes in MVMBF and the number of occlusal contacts during retention, controlling for sex, age, and body mass index. 5 Both investigators and clinicians would benefit from objective data regarding stabilization of the MVMBF.…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

See 3 more Smart Citations

Maximum voluntary molar bite force in subjects with malocclusion: multifactor analysis

Alam

Alfawzan

2020

J Int Med Res

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Objective This study was performed to determine the maximum voluntary molar bite force (MVMBF) in relation to age, sex, lip competency, midline shifting, dental and skeletal malocclusion, overjet, overbite, and crowding. Methods One hundred Saudi patients with orthodontic malocclusion aged 14 to 25 years (51 male and 49 female patients) were investigated in this cross-sectional study. The baseline MVMBF on the right and left side was evaluated in all patients before commencing any orthodontic treatment. The MVMBF was registered with a portable occlusal force gauge in the first molar region during maximal clenching. Results The MVMBF significantly varied with respect to all nine confounding variables. The MVMBF significantly increased with an age of >18 years, male sex, right-side lip competency, no midline shift, dental and skeletal Class I malocclusion, normal overjet, normal overbite, and mild crowding. Conclusion All nine variables examined in the present study significantly influenced the MVMBF.

show abstract

Section: Discussionsupporting

confidence: 93%

Section: Methodsmentioning

confidence: 99%

Section: Methodsmentioning

confidence: 99%

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

See 2 more Smart Citations

Maximum voluntary molar bite force in subjects with malocclusion: multifactor analysis

Alam

Alfawzan

2020

J Int Med Res

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…The measurement of maximum isometric bite force (MIBF) can be performed by using an electronic dynamometer that is useful for evaluating the performance of the muscles of mastication. Several studies have investigated the bite force in different ways, analyzing their relationship with facial morphology, mastication performance, different malocclusions, teething stages and their variability in different populatio ns (3,12,13,14,15,16,17,18,19,20,21) . In order to masticate effectively, the stomatognathic system depends on the muscles of mastication and the craniofacial development pattern, making it essential to investigate the influence of mouth breathing on the bite force in children undergoing craniofacial development.…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Força de mordida em respiradores bucais

Yosetake

Grechi²,

Trawitzki

et al. 2016

Audiol., Commun. Res.

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Purpose: To investigate the influence of mouth breathing on the maximum molar bite force in children. Methods: One hundred and five children were divided into two groups: the control group (CG) without respiratory symptoms and the clinical pattern of a competent lip seal, and the mouth breathers (MB) who had respiratory complaints and an otorhinolaryngological diagnosis of nasal obstruction. All participants were assessed for their maximum isometric bite force (MIBF), on both sides of the dental arch, with a gnathodynamometer positioned in the region of the first molars. Paired and unpaired Student's t-tests were used in the comparisons of the MIBF of both sides from each group and between each group (CG and MB). The degree of obstruction was correlated with MIBF (MB), using the Spearman correlation test. Results with p≤0.05 were considered significant. Results: There were no significant differences in the MIBF values between the right and left sides of the dental arch. In a comparison of the MIBF values of the CG and MB participants, no difference between the groups were found in general. However, when the age of the survey participants was correlated against MIBF, an increase in MIBF value according to age was evident for the CG participants. Conclusion: Nasal obstruction did not influence maximum isometric bite force in children between three and 12 years old. There was no correlation between the degree of obstruction and the bite force. The CG bite force was higher for older children, however, this correlation was not observed in MB.Keywords: Bite force; Mouth breathing; Child; Nasal obstruction; Dentition, Mixed RESUMO Objetivo: Investigar a influência da respiração bucal na força de mordida máxima de dentes molares em crianças. Métodos: Cento e cinco crianças foram divididas em dois grupos: grupo controle (GC), sem queixas respiratórias e com padrão clínico de vedamento labial e grupo de respiradores bucais (GRB), com queixas respiratórias e diagnóstico otorrinolaringológico de obstrução nasal. Todos os participantes realizaram a avaliação da força de mordida isométrica máxima (FMIM), de ambos os lados da arcada dentária, por meio de um gnatodinamômetro posicionado na região dos primeiros molares. Os testes estatísticos t de Student pareado e não pareado foram usados nas comparações da FMIM entre os lados, de cada grupo, e entre os grupos (GC e GRB). O grau de obstrução foi correlacionado à FMIM (GRB), por meio do teste de correlação de Spearman. Foram considerados significativos resultados com p≤0,05. Resultados: Não houve diferença nos valores de FMIM entre os lados direito e esquerdo da arcada dentária. Quando comparados os valores de FMIM dos participantes do GC e do GRB não foi observada diferença, de um modo geral. Entretanto, quando correlacionada a FMIM com a idade dos participantes da pesquisa, notou-se que no GC houve aumento no valor da FMIM, de acordo com a idade. Conclusão: A obstrução nasal não influenciou na força de mordida isométrica máxima em crianças de 3 a 12 anos de idade. Não ...

show abstract