2016
DOI: 10.17224/energagric.2016v31n2p186-191
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Análise comparativa de estimativas de custo de produção e rentabilidade entre sojas RR1 E RR2 PRO/Bti

Abstract: RESUMO: O objetivo do estudo foi analisar o custo de produção e os indicadores econômicos do sistema produtivo com a soja RR1(sem resistência a insetos) e soja RR2 Pro/Bt (resistente a insetos) na região sudeste do estado de Mato Grosso. Os dados de custos e preços foram obtidos com a aplicação de questionários junto aos produtores da região. Foram estimados o custo operacional efetivo (COE) e custo operacional total (COT). A partir do custo operacional total foram estimados os seguintes indicadores de rentabi… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

1
1
0
4

Year Published

2018
2018
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 7 publications
1
1
0
4
Order By: Relevance
“…In accordance with the economic indicators analyzed, it was noticed that the 2020/2021 soybean harvest of the property under study presented viability for both cultivars; however, the RR cultivar (area A) resulted in more attractive values than the RR2 PRO cultivar (area B ). The production costs of RR2 PRO soybeans were lower than the costs of RR soybeans due to the smaller amount of insecticides, labor, and machinery used; the results obtained by the authors Carvalho et al (2016) corroborate the present study, both cultivars presented economic viability.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 90%
“…In accordance with the economic indicators analyzed, it was noticed that the 2020/2021 soybean harvest of the property under study presented viability for both cultivars; however, the RR cultivar (area A) resulted in more attractive values than the RR2 PRO cultivar (area B ). The production costs of RR2 PRO soybeans were lower than the costs of RR soybeans due to the smaller amount of insecticides, labor, and machinery used; the results obtained by the authors Carvalho et al (2016) corroborate the present study, both cultivars presented economic viability.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 90%
“…O índice Benefício/Custo refere-se a partir da comparação entre receitas e despesas totais atualizadas a uma taxa de juro, ou seja, é quanto se espera ganhar para cada unidade de capital investido. Sendo alcançado pela relação entre o valor da receita bruta e o valor líquido dos custos, oferecido em porcentagem (CARVALHO et al, 2016). Em que: VPL -valor presente líquido; Rj -valor atual das receitas; Cj -valor atual dos custos; i -taxa de juros; j -período em que a receita ou o custo ocorrem; n -número máximo de períodos.…”
Section: Análise Econômicaunclassified
“…Therefore, understanding the production chains, as well as production costs, real profit, and the agricultural market, observing the prices of commodities, to identify the best time to market their production is a determining factor for the maintenance of this sector, relating economic, social, and sustainable development (Zanella & Leismann, 2017). According to Carvalho et al (2016), the financial monitoring of all agricultural activity allows obtaining data for decision making and verifying the profitability and viability of future productive arrangements. Economic feasibility analysis of a project is the first instrument to be measured for decision making on the investment, presenting the positive and negative points of the system (Seibert et al, 2014).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%