Analgesic Effects of Noninvasive Brain Stimulation in Rodent Animal Models: A Systematic Review of Translational Findings

Abstract

Objectives: Noninvasive brain stimulation (NIBS) interventions have demonstrated promising results in the clinical treatment of pain, according to several preliminary trials, although the results have been mixed. The limitations of clinical research on NIBS are the insufficient understanding of its mechanisms of action, a lack of adequate safety data, and several disparities with regard to stimulation parameters, which have hindered the generalizability of such studies. Thus, experimental animal research that allows the use of more invasive interventions and creates additional control of independent variables and confounders is desirable. To this end, we systematically reviewed animal studies investigating the analgesic effects of NIBS. In addition, we also explored the investigation of NIBS in animal models of stroke as to compare these findings with NIBS animal pain research. Methods: Of 1916 articles that were found initially, we identified 15 studies (stroke and pain studies) per our eligibility criteria that used NIBS methods, such as transcranial direct current stimulation, paired associative stimulation, transcranial magnetic stimulation, and transcranial electrostimulation. We extracted the main outcomes on stroke and pain, as well as the methods and electrical parameters of each technique. Results: NIBS techniques are effective in alleviating pain. Similar beneficial clinical effects are observed in stroke. The main insights from these animal studies are the following: 1) combination of NIBS with analgesic drugs has a synergistic effect; 2) effects are dependent on the parameters of stimulation, and in fact, not necessarily the strongest stimulation parameter (i.e., the largest intensity of stimulation) is associated with the largest benefit; 3) pain studies show an overall good quality as indexed by Animals in Research: Reporting In Vivo Experiments guidelines of the reporting of animal experiments, but insufficient with regard to the reporting of safety data for brain stimulation; 4) these studies suggest that NIBS techniques have a primary effect on synaptic plasticity, but they also suggest other mechanisms of action such as via neurovascular modulation. Conclusions: We found a limited number of animal studies for both pain and stroke NIBS experimental research. There is a lack of safety data in animal studies in these two topics and results from these studies have not been yet fully tested and translated to human research. We discuss the challenges and limitations of translating experimental animal research on NIBS into clinical studies.

Invasive and non-invasive brain stimulation for treatment of neuropathic pain in patients with spinal cord injury: A review

“…higher intensity) is not necessarily associated with the largest beneficial effect. 99 Stimulating the human cortex using tDCS or TMS temporarily reduces clinical and experimental pain; however, it is unclear which cortical targets are the most effective, and the mechanisms of central pain relief remain poorly understood. M1 has been a popular target for managing neuropathic pain, but it is unclear whether M1 is the only effective cortical target; to date, no studies have thoroughly investigated the effects of stimulation of other cortical targets (i.e.…”

Transcutaneous Electrical Nerve Stimulation in Rodent Models of Neuropathic Pain: A Meta-Analysis

“…The disadvantages of clinical trials are that independent variables and confounders (Volz et al, 2012), including the timing of the application of TENS, cannot be controlled, leading to the insufficient understanding of whether TENS can be utilized in acute or chronic phases of pain caused by nerve injury. To this end, we systematically reviewed animal studies examining the nociceptive effects of TENS and stratified the included studies in terms of the timing of the application of TENS.…”

Measurements of rat brain activity originating from ultrasound waves in air

“…Examples are Vagus Nerve Stimulation common both in epilepsy and psychiatric pathologies [1] [2] and in the field of pain control trough electrical stimulation of the brain or disruption of electrical impulses from peripheral nerves [3] [4]. Electrical brain stimulation is also performed in vivo on rats in advanced research and comparative studies [5].…”