2000
DOI: 10.1177/082585970001601s06
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Analgesia, Virtue, and the Principle of Double Effect

Abstract: The principle of double effect is widely used to permit the administration of narcotics and sedatives with the intent to palliate dying patients, even though the administration of these drugs may cause hastening of death. In recent medical literature, this principle's validity has been severely criticized, causing health care providers to fear providing good palliative care. Most of the criticisms levelled at the principle of double effect arise from misconceptions about its purpose and origins. This discussio… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
11
0

Year Published

2002
2002
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 23 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 31 publications
0
11
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In the case of terminally ill patients, this problem is different in two ways: (1) terminally ill patients may have developed tolerance, and require doses of opioids that are unsafe for opioid-naive patients; and (2) the risk of aggressive analgesia in terminally ill patients is different from the risk in patients with reversible underlying disease processes. Ethically, if the patient, family, and clinician agree that the primary treatment goal is to provide comfort, the potential risk of an earlier death as a side effect of medications is acceptable (the “double effect” principle) 20. A primary focus of ED care is diagnosis and stabilization.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the case of terminally ill patients, this problem is different in two ways: (1) terminally ill patients may have developed tolerance, and require doses of opioids that are unsafe for opioid-naive patients; and (2) the risk of aggressive analgesia in terminally ill patients is different from the risk in patients with reversible underlying disease processes. Ethically, if the patient, family, and clinician agree that the primary treatment goal is to provide comfort, the potential risk of an earlier death as a side effect of medications is acceptable (the “double effect” principle) 20. A primary focus of ED care is diagnosis and stabilization.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Ethical management of these symptoms involves balancing symptomatic relief against administration of drugs that might hasten death. The principle of "double effect" recognizes that when treatments intended to relieve suffering incidentally hasten death, ethical principles against killing have not been breached (54). In some countries, intentionally hastening death "for the purpose of relieving suffering" has come to be ethically and legally acceptable (55).…”
Section: Withdrawing Life-sustaining Treatments Double Effect and Hmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…According to the principle of double effect, an action that has one good (intended) effect and one potentially bad (unintended, but foreseeable) effect is permissible, if the following conditions are met: (1) the action itself must be good or indifferent, with only the good consequences of the action sincerely intended, (2) the good effect must not be produced by the bad effect, and (3) there must be a compelling reason for permitting the foreseeable bad effect to potentially occur 64. This well-vetted approach provides an ethical standard that supports the use of interventions intended to relieve pain and suffering even though there is a foreseeable possibility that death may be hastened 65. In cases in which the child is terminally ill and in severe pain, using large doses of opioids and sedatives to manage pain is justified when no other treatment options are available that would both relieve the pain and make the risk of death less likely 66.…”
Section: Establishing Realistic Goals Of Carementioning
confidence: 99%