2013
DOI: 10.1016/j.chiabu.2013.03.011
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Anal findings in children with and without probable anal penetration: A retrospective study of 1115 children referred for suspected sexual abuse

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
20
0
4

Year Published

2014
2014
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
5
4

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 45 publications
(26 citation statements)
references
References 25 publications
2
20
0
4
Order By: Relevance
“…This result is in line with the literature, whereby Stites and Bruni conclude that a traumatic etiology in this case must be investigated [21,25]. Skin tags: No child had more than two skin tags.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 91%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…This result is in line with the literature, whereby Stites and Bruni conclude that a traumatic etiology in this case must be investigated [21,25]. Skin tags: No child had more than two skin tags.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 91%
“…It is thus necessary to improve our knowledge of anal lesions that are non-traumatic in origin [12,19,20,21,22,23]. We conducted a study with the objective of describing anal lesions seen in children who were not the victims of sexual assault who presented with a digestive disease.…”
Section: A N U S C R I P Tmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…32 In another study, total anal dilation occurred in 12% of the suspected abuse group and was significantly associated with reported anal penetration, after controlling for examination position and presence of anal symptoms. 33 Further research is needed to assess the significance of anal findings with respect to abuse, and the impact of examination positions, techniques, and other factors on the frequency of these findings.…”
Section: Interpretation Of Findingsmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…En segundo lugar, aun para las formas de abuso que incluyen penetración, o formas de roce con eyaculación, la posibilidad de detección del material biológico del abusador en el cuerpo de la víctima puede verse imposibilitada a causa del corto intervalo de tiempo en que se mantienen estos vestigios 22 . En tercer lugar, cuando hay lesiones genitales o anales, los estudios han demostrado que tales lesiones cicatrizan rápidamente y, en general, sin dejar vestigios o dejando vestigios que son inespecíficos 23,24 . Así, además de las formas de abuso que no dejan vestigios, también existe la posibilidad de que no se hallen evidencias físicas debido al retardo temporal entre la pericia y el abuso sexual, como ocurrió para la mayoría de los casos de esta investigación.…”
Section: Discussionunclassified