2008
DOI: 10.1016/j.jhin.2008.05.023
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Anaesthetists' role in computer keyboard contamination in an operating room

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
25
0
6

Year Published

2011
2011
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
3

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 48 publications
(31 citation statements)
references
References 7 publications
0
25
0
6
Order By: Relevance
“…In 2001, Merry and colleagues drew attention to the question of hand washing by anaesthetists21 and, more recently, Loftus and colleagues demonstrated that the hands of anaesthesia personnel may be an important source of contamination 27 28. Other possible sources of cross-contamination by personnel in operating theatres include mobile phones29 and computer keyboards 30. Previous authors have noted that the widely used anaesthetic agent propofol, which is provided in a lipid emulsion containing soya oil and egg lecithin, readily supports microbial growth 31 32.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In 2001, Merry and colleagues drew attention to the question of hand washing by anaesthetists21 and, more recently, Loftus and colleagues demonstrated that the hands of anaesthesia personnel may be an important source of contamination 27 28. Other possible sources of cross-contamination by personnel in operating theatres include mobile phones29 and computer keyboards 30. Previous authors have noted that the widely used anaesthetic agent propofol, which is provided in a lipid emulsion containing soya oil and egg lecithin, readily supports microbial growth 31 32.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Nach der Desinfektion von Fußböden war die Erregerlast auf den Flächen 21-fach, auf anderen Flächen 90-fach geringer als wenn nur gereinigt wurde [226]. Auf Flä-chen, die nicht regelmäßig in die Aufbereitung einbezogen wurden wie Badges, PC-Tastaturen und PC-Maus, war die Kontamination deutlich höher als auf regelmäßig desinfizierten Flächen [227,228]. Wurde nur gereinigt, unterschied sich die mikrobielle Belastung der Flächen nicht von der Situation vor der Reinigung [229].…”
Section: Instrumentarium (Medizinprodukteunclassified
“…Surface contamination of anesthesia machines, 1,2 mobile telephones, 3 keyboards, 4 stethoscopes, 5 and manual ventilation bags 6 has been described. Medical equipment is classified according to the degree of contact with patients into uncritical, semicritical, and critical, and each classification requires a different level of disinfection or sterilization.…”
Section: Root Cause Analysis and Infection Control Recommendationsmentioning
confidence: 99%