2001
DOI: 10.1046/j.1365-2044.2001.01840.x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Anaesthesia without induction rooms

Abstract: Letters (two copies) must be typewritten on one side of the paper only and double spaced with wide margins. Copy should be prepared in the usual style and format of the Correspondence section. Authors must follow the advice about references and other matters contained in the Notice to Contributors to Anaesthesia printed at the back of each issue. The degree and diplomas of each author must be given in a covering letter personally signed by all the authors. Correspondence presented in any other style or format … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2002
2002
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 2 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In many countries the induction of anaesthesia is carried out in theatre without any apparent disadvantage to the patient. There has been considerable debate in the anaesthetic literature over the last 10 years regarding the continued use of these ‘safe havens’[2, 4, 6–12] particularly since the introduction of clinical governance and the increasing costs of monitoring equipment. However, our results suggest that at present there has been little change in practice.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In many countries the induction of anaesthesia is carried out in theatre without any apparent disadvantage to the patient. There has been considerable debate in the anaesthetic literature over the last 10 years regarding the continued use of these ‘safe havens’[2, 4, 6–12] particularly since the introduction of clinical governance and the increasing costs of monitoring equipment. However, our results suggest that at present there has been little change in practice.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The almost interminable wait for treatment on the NHS has reached an unprecedented high [3], and we cannot disregard the efficiency gains that parallel processing models provide. A patient can be `signed-in´, have an intravenous cannula inserted, attached to monitoring, positioned, have nerve blocks placed [4] and, depending on local set-up, have anaesthesia induced simultaneously with the emergence of the previous patient or whilst theatre cleaning and set-up is taking place. Implementing such a model can result in a reduction in non-operative time of 46%, allowing one extra case to be performed per 7-h operating list [5].…”
Section: Efficiencymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although the letters from O'Connor et al . ( Anaesthesia 2003; 58 : 912–3) and in previous copies of this journal [3,4] correctly state the obvious patient safety benefits and economic advantages, no mention has been made of the staff health and safety issues surrounding induction of anaesthesia in the operating theatre. The obvious advantage is that on many occasions patients are able to move themselves from the transfer trolley to the operating table prior to induction and also position themselves centrally on the table with greater accuracy.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%