1980
DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2044.1980.tb05053.x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Anaesthesia for surgical correction of fractured femoral neck A comparison of three techniques

Abstract: SummaryS h t y patients with fractured neck of femur and scheduled for surgical correction were randomly allocated to receiue one of three anaesthetic techniques: general anaesthesia: spinalana1gesia;psoas compartment block. The patienis in the local anaesthetic groups also received a light general anaesthetic. There was liitle difference in the pre-, intra-and postoperatiue euents, and no difference in postoperative mortality.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

1
24
1

Year Published

2001
2001
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
3
3

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 40 publications
(27 citation statements)
references
References 6 publications
1
24
1
Order By: Relevance
“…15 Berggren et al 15 Bigler et al 16 Casati et al 18 Davis et al 22 Davis et al 23 Eroglu et al 25 Hole et al 27 Jones et al 28 Juelsgaard et al 30 McKenzie et al 34 McLaren et al 35 Nielson et al 37 Racle et al 38 Riis et al 39 Valentin et al 41 White et al 42 Williams-Russo et al 43 Random = 0.00; Chi 2 = 14.80, df = 10 (P = 0.14); I 2 = 32% Test for overall effect: Z = 1.15 (P = 0.25) Test for subgroup differences: Chi 2 = 1.29, df = 2 (P = 0.53); I 2 = 0% not possible to pool the data for degree of satisfaction, blood transfusion requirements or quality of life. The data on the degree of satisfaction and blood transfusion requirements were not described correctly in the studies included.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…15 Berggren et al 15 Bigler et al 16 Casati et al 18 Davis et al 22 Davis et al 23 Eroglu et al 25 Hole et al 27 Jones et al 28 Juelsgaard et al 30 McKenzie et al 34 McLaren et al 35 Nielson et al 37 Racle et al 38 Riis et al 39 Valentin et al 41 White et al 42 Williams-Russo et al 43 Random = 0.00; Chi 2 = 14.80, df = 10 (P = 0.14); I 2 = 32% Test for overall effect: Z = 1.15 (P = 0.25) Test for subgroup differences: Chi 2 = 1.29, df = 2 (P = 0.53); I 2 = 0% not possible to pool the data for degree of satisfaction, blood transfusion requirements or quality of life. The data on the degree of satisfaction and blood transfusion requirements were not described correctly in the studies included.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…There was no statistically significant difference considering all types of surgeries (MD = -0.05; 95% CI: -0.69 to 0.58; P = 0.87; 870 participants) (Figure 7). 15,18,38,39,42,43 Postoperative cognitive dysfunction: this outcome was analyzed in six studies. 15,18,38,39,42,44 Three types of surgery were conducted in the studies included.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations