2012
DOI: 10.1097/eja.0b013e32834ad9d3
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Anaesthesia by non-anaesthesiologists

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
4
2

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 7 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…[49] However, 21 national societies of anesthesia felt that non-anesthesiologists should not be allowed to administer propofol. [50515253] As a result, these endorsements were later retracted by the societies that endorsed them. [54] It prompted the Dumonceau to question the wisdom and doubt if these retraction statements were all about job preservation and money.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[49] However, 21 national societies of anesthesia felt that non-anesthesiologists should not be allowed to administer propofol. [50515253] As a result, these endorsements were later retracted by the societies that endorsed them. [54] It prompted the Dumonceau to question the wisdom and doubt if these retraction statements were all about job preservation and money.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The "war against pain" launched two decades ago in the US has been described as similar to opening Pandora's box, particularly by allowing nonanesthesiologists to administer potent anesthetics [45]. Clearly, this war has been lost by many patients: it is estimated to have caused 10,000 to 20,000 drug-overdose deaths in the US (and the many other adverse effects of long-term opioids also need to be considered [46,47]).…”
Section: Petition In the Us To Set Ceiling Morphine Dosages And Duratmentioning
confidence: 99%