2020
DOI: 10.1016/j.biortech.2020.123930
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Anaerobic membrane bioreactor (AnMBR) scale-up from laboratory to pilot-scale for microalgae and primary sludge co-digestion: Biological and filtration assessment

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 15 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 30 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Microbial community examination showed that UF membrane was able to retain the variety of microbial species within the bioreactor. Even if the C/N ratio of the mixture in the study was lower than the optimal range reported in the literature, high organic matter degradation can be explained by the enriched microbial community due to membrane retention (Serna-García et al 2020c). Among the microbial community, Chloroflexi and Proteobacteria were the most abundant phyla.…”
Section: Sludge Streammentioning
confidence: 71%
“…Microbial community examination showed that UF membrane was able to retain the variety of microbial species within the bioreactor. Even if the C/N ratio of the mixture in the study was lower than the optimal range reported in the literature, high organic matter degradation can be explained by the enriched microbial community due to membrane retention (Serna-García et al 2020c). Among the microbial community, Chloroflexi and Proteobacteria were the most abundant phyla.…”
Section: Sludge Streammentioning
confidence: 71%
“…Conventional aerobic and chemical WW nutrient removal methods require high energy consumption, have long process times, and result in carbon emissions as well as excess sludge discharge (Li et al, 2019). In contrast, anaerobic membrane bioreactors (AnMBRs) require less energy while efficiently removing organic matter and suspended solids (Serna-García et al, 2020a). AnMBR technology yields energy rich biogas (methane, CH 4 ) as a co-product of wastewater treatment, however, with a high percentage of carbon dioxide (CO 2 ) (Viruela et al, 2016).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Conventional WW nutrient removal methods, both aerobic and chemical treatments, require high energy consumption and long process times while resulting in carbon emissions and excess sludge discharge (Li et al, 2019). In contrast, anaerobic membrane bioreactors (AnMBRs) have lower energy requirements while efficiently removing organic matter and suspended solids (Serna-García et al, 2020a). AnMBR process efficiencies are achieved by the combination of anaerobic microbial metabolism and high-surface area filtration technologies (Viruela et al, 2016).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%