2013
DOI: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2012.11.016
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Anaerobic co-digestion of source segregated brown water (feces-without-urine) and food waste: For Singapore context

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

4
26
2

Year Published

2013
2013
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

2
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 85 publications
(35 citation statements)
references
References 17 publications
4
26
2
Order By: Relevance
“…These results suggest that feces has promising potential as a feedstock for biogas production. Although, in contrast to a previous study [12], a synergetic effect was not shown in the co-digestion runs, it was demonstrated that feces and food waste can be effectively co-digested without antagonistic effect. Two identical continuously-stirred tank reactors with a working volume of 15 L are being operated in Sa-Wol-Dang to evaluate the efficiency and stability of the co-digestion process in continuous mode.…”
Section: Biogas Productioncontrasting
confidence: 99%
“…These results suggest that feces has promising potential as a feedstock for biogas production. Although, in contrast to a previous study [12], a synergetic effect was not shown in the co-digestion runs, it was demonstrated that feces and food waste can be effectively co-digested without antagonistic effect. Two identical continuously-stirred tank reactors with a working volume of 15 L are being operated in Sa-Wol-Dang to evaluate the efficiency and stability of the co-digestion process in continuous mode.…”
Section: Biogas Productioncontrasting
confidence: 99%
“…Total solid (TS) content of the AD feedstock is suggested to be maintained at 6-8 % to ensure the success of AD [52]. In real cases, FW collected in food courts has comparatively high solid content (TS about 30 %) after the manual removal of bones, egg shells and other nonbiodegradable components [53]. In other words, additional water is needed to decrease the solid content of FW.…”
Section: Small-scale Anaerobic Digestionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The Co-digesters need to be built in between FW collection points and animal farms to reduce the transportation cost and carbon footprint Brown water Approximately 22,410 tons/day from every toilet Source separation of brown water from yellow water (urine and flushing water) and gray water (used water from bathroom, pantry and laundry) is required [53]. Brown water is a better diluting solution than AD effluent.…”
Section: Small-scale Anaerobic Digestionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Hence, we decided to develop standard solutions to save water consumed for flushing and we found that, by introducing two different types of water efficient toilets (namely composting toilet [18] and No-Mix vacuum toilet (NMV) [19,20]), it is possible to reduce about 40% of the yearly global water consumption in EAC. For instance normal toilets require 6 l of water per flush, while with composting and NMV solutions the amount of consumed water is estimated to be less than 1 l per use [18,20].…”
Section: Water Managementmentioning
confidence: 99%