2015
DOI: 10.1016/j.biortech.2015.01.039
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Anaerobic co-digestion of pig manure and algae: Impact of intracellular algal products recovery on co-digestion performance

Abstract: This paper investigates anaerobic co-digestion of pig manure and algae (Scenedesmus sp.) with and without extraction of intracellular algal co-products, with views towards the development of a biorefinery concept for lipid, protein and/or biogas production. Protein and/or lipids were extracted from Scenedesmus sp. using free nitrous acid pre-treatments and solvent-based Soxhlet extraction, respectively. Processing increased algae methane yield between 29% and 37% compared to raw algae (VS basis), but reduced t… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
54
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
3
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 142 publications
(73 citation statements)
references
References 33 publications
2
54
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Not only is AD a relatively simple process from an engineering/infrastructure perspective, but it also has the potential to exploit the entire organic carbon content of macroalgae, and can readily tolerate high moisture content, therefore eliminating energy intensive drying (Jard et al 2013;Milledge and Heaven 2014). However, the biomethane potential of S. muticum is low at 0.13 L CH 4 g -1 VS (Jard et al 2013;Soto et al 2015), and considerably below that typical of seaweed at 0.2 L CH 4 g -1 VS (Alvarado- Morales et al 2013;Chen et al 2015) and *30 % of that from common commercially exploited feedstocks (Astals et al 2015;Banks and Zhang 2010;Golueke et al 1957;Nallathambi Gunaseelan 1997;Nguyen et al 2014). This, together with the availability of a variety of other more readily fermentable wastes, may make the collection of S. muticum for AD commercially unattractive.…”
Section: Fuelmentioning
confidence: 96%
“…Not only is AD a relatively simple process from an engineering/infrastructure perspective, but it also has the potential to exploit the entire organic carbon content of macroalgae, and can readily tolerate high moisture content, therefore eliminating energy intensive drying (Jard et al 2013;Milledge and Heaven 2014). However, the biomethane potential of S. muticum is low at 0.13 L CH 4 g -1 VS (Jard et al 2013;Soto et al 2015), and considerably below that typical of seaweed at 0.2 L CH 4 g -1 VS (Alvarado- Morales et al 2013;Chen et al 2015) and *30 % of that from common commercially exploited feedstocks (Astals et al 2015;Banks and Zhang 2010;Golueke et al 1957;Nallathambi Gunaseelan 1997;Nguyen et al 2014). This, together with the availability of a variety of other more readily fermentable wastes, may make the collection of S. muticum for AD commercially unattractive.…”
Section: Fuelmentioning
confidence: 96%
“…and waste activated sludge and found that anaerobic co-digestion of varying amounts of sludge with Chlorella increased the biogas yields by 73% -79%, compared to mono-digestion of Chlorella. Astals et al (2015) investigated anaerobic co-digestion of algae Scenedesmus sp. and pig manure.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…is low at~0.13 L·CH 4 ·g −1 ·VS [33,34,52], and considerably below that typical of seaweed at 0.2 L·CH 4 ·g −1 ·VS [121,174,175] and~30% of that from common commercially exploited feedstocks [176][177][178][179][180]. There is considerable conjecture about the reasons for the relatively low practical methane yields compared to the theoretical values [33,71,103,120,181], and more research is needed to find the cause of low methane yields and how to overcome them.…”
Section: Anaerobic Digestionmentioning
confidence: 99%