2004
DOI: 10.3354/ame036293
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Anaerobic ammonium oxidation in an estuarine sediment

Abstract: 15N and microsensor techniques. Anammox rates estimated with microsensors were less than 22% of the rates measured with isotopes. It is suggested that this discrepancy was due to the presence of fauna, because the applied 15 N technique captures total N 2 production while the microsensor technique only captures diffusion-controlled N 2 production at the sediment surface. This hypothesis was verified by consistent agreement between the methods when applied to defaunated sediments.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

11
179
0

Year Published

2010
2010
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
10

Relationship

1
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 243 publications
(190 citation statements)
references
References 49 publications
11
179
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Various anoxic marine ecosystems have been monitored for anammox activity and the presence of anammox cells (Kuypers et al 2003Rysgaard et al 2004;Risgaard-Petersen et al 2004;Schmid et al 2007). The anammox bacteria in marine environments seem to be restricted to the Scalindua branch with relatively little biodiversity as reflected in very similar 16S rRNA gene sequences (Fig.…”
Section: The Anammox and Nc10 Bacteriamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Various anoxic marine ecosystems have been monitored for anammox activity and the presence of anammox cells (Kuypers et al 2003Rysgaard et al 2004;Risgaard-Petersen et al 2004;Schmid et al 2007). The anammox bacteria in marine environments seem to be restricted to the Scalindua branch with relatively little biodiversity as reflected in very similar 16S rRNA gene sequences (Fig.…”
Section: The Anammox and Nc10 Bacteriamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Measuring anammox and denitrification rate with 15 N-labeled ammonium and nitrate The presence, activity and potential of anammox and denitrifying bacteria were measured as described in Risgaard-Petersen et al (2004) and Engström et al (2005). Soil samples of known weight and density were transferred to the He-flushed, 6.6-ml glass vials (Exetainer, Labco, High Wycombe, Buckinghamshire, UK), together with N 2 -purged media water from the paddy field.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Following homogenisation, * 1 g wet sediment and 900 lL of nitrate-free artificial river water (Smart and Barko 1985) were added to gas-tight vials (3 mL). The sediment slurries were then left to ''pre-incubate'' for 24 h to reduce any traces of ambient 14 N-nitrate and oxygen before starting the 15 N experiments (Risgaard-Petersen et al 2004). To start the experiment, 100 lL of 98 at.% 15 N-sodium nitrate was injected through the butyl septum of each vial (n = 4 per original sediment sample), then they were then gently shaken (rpm 60, SSM1 Orbital Shaker, Stuart, Stone, UK) before bacterial activity was stopped via injection of 100 lL of zinc chloride after 0, 1.5, 4 and 6 h (see Lansdown et al 2012 for more detail).…”
Section: Laboratory Determination Of Nitrate Reducing Potentials In Smentioning
confidence: 99%