2019
DOI: 10.1090/tran/7543
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

An 𝐿^{𝑝} theory of sparse graph convergence I: Limits, sparse random graph models, and power law distributions

Abstract: We introduce and develop a theory of limits for sequences of sparse graphs based on L p graphons, which generalizes both the existing L ∞ theory of dense graph limits and its extension by Bollobás and Riordan to sparse graphs without dense spots. In doing so, we replace the no dense spots hypothesis with weaker assumptions, which allow us to analyze graphs with power law degree distributions. This gives the first broadly applicable limit theory for sparse graphs with unbounded average degrees. In this paper, w… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

1
188
0
1

Year Published

2019
2019
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 118 publications
(190 citation statements)
references
References 44 publications
(81 reference statements)
1
188
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…They also characterize the convergence of graph sequences based on graph homomorphism densities . Recently, graphon theory has been generalized for sparse graph sequences .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…They also characterize the convergence of graph sequences based on graph homomorphism densities . Recently, graphon theory has been generalized for sparse graph sequences .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It seems that the two core ingredients of our proof, Lemma 3.4 and the second moment argument do have sparse counterparts. The sparse counterpart to Lemma 3.4 is , Theorem 2.14] which says that if pn1n then the sequence 1pn·G(n,pn·W) (here, the factor 1pn in front of the random graph G(n,pn·W) denotes edge weighting; this is the natural way to deal with the scaling in this situation) converges to W in the cut‐distance almost surely. Our second moment argument is complicated but it builds on the seminal work which works down to the range pn=Θ(1n). Thus, at least when WL(Ω2), our methods possibly extend to this range.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…such that for each i ∈ N, W i × i = 0 almost everywhere. Let us turn our attention to the main subject of the paper, that is, to the behavior of the clique number in G(n, W ) scaled as in (3). As a warm-up for studying (3), we first deal with its bipartite counterpart.…”
Section: Proposition 21mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Borgs et al . () and Orbanz and Roy ()): the generated graph is dense; unless it is k ‐partite or disconnected, the distance between any two vertices in an infinite graph is almost surely 1 or 2, etc. A graphon can encode any fixed pattern on some number n of vertices, but this pattern then occurs on every possible subgraph of size n with fixed probability. (b)Configuration models are popular in probability (because of their simplicity) but have limited use in statistics unless the quantity of interest is the degree sequence itself: they are ‘maximally random’ given the degrees, in a manner similar to exponential families being maximally random given a sufficient statistic, and are thus insensitive to any structure that is not captured by the degrees.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%