2008
DOI: 10.1016/j.datak.2007.09.008
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

An XML Schema integration and query mechanism system

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

0
11
0

Year Published

2008
2008
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
4
2
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 34 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 18 publications
0
11
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Although these criteria are based on the criteria created for schema integration, the authors modified them to a specifically created hierarchical structure. Later work by the same authors (Madria et al 2008) modified these criteria to known criteria in the literature such as completeness and correctness (the integrated schema must contain all concepts presented in any component schema correctly; the integrated schema must be a representative of the union of the application domains associated with the schemas), minimality (if the same concept appears in more than one component schema, it must occur only once in the integrated schema), and understandability (the integrated schema should be easy to be understood by the designer and the end user; this implies that among the several possible representations of the results of integration allowed by a data model, the one that is most easily understandable should be chosen). The same definitions may be found in many works; for example, Schmitt and Saake (2005) and Batini et al (1986).…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 95%
“…Although these criteria are based on the criteria created for schema integration, the authors modified them to a specifically created hierarchical structure. Later work by the same authors (Madria et al 2008) modified these criteria to known criteria in the literature such as completeness and correctness (the integrated schema must contain all concepts presented in any component schema correctly; the integrated schema must be a representative of the union of the application domains associated with the schemas), minimality (if the same concept appears in more than one component schema, it must occur only once in the integrated schema), and understandability (the integrated schema should be easy to be understood by the designer and the end user; this implies that among the several possible representations of the results of integration allowed by a data model, the one that is most easily understandable should be chosen). The same definitions may be found in many works; for example, Schmitt and Saake (2005) and Batini et al (1986).…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 95%
“…In many works XML or XML and ontology are used as a common data model for information integration (for example, [3,22,30]). In [3,30] GAV approach is considered to support arbitrary information sources.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In [3,30] GAV approach is considered to support arbitrary information sources. Only XML sources is considered in [22]. As rules XQuery is used as query lan-guage in approaches which is based on the XML.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It has many advantages over DTD (Document Type Definition), including consistency, scalability, interoperability, and standardization [9]. XSD is far more powerful than DTD in describing XML languages.…”
Section: B Xml Schemamentioning
confidence: 99%